top of page

Engaging, culturally relevant and useless: Teachers aren't trained to teach writing

  • Writer: Joanne Jacobs
    Joanne Jacobs
  • 1 day ago
  • 4 min read


As a first-year teacher, Patrick Hunt was unprepared to teach writing at a high-poverty, low-performing New York City high school, he writes in a guest essay on BellRingers. He tried to be "student-centered" and engaging and culturally relevant, but his students weren't learning.


Experienced teachers gave conflicting advice, recalls Hunt, who now writes on Cafeteria Duty. Everyone was doing his or her own thing, so there was no consistency from year to year. Direct, explicit instruction was "heretical," according to his teacher training.


"Even what an 'essay' is has become open to interpretation, with lots of teachers accepting Google Slides presentations in lieu of a proper argument essay."

When he took master's degree courses at Teachers' College, Columbia, Hunt thought his charismatic graduate-school professor would explain how to teach writing in The Teaching of Writing class. Nope. "Every class discussion found its way to the subjects of power and identity," writes Hunt. There was “Writing As Social Action,” but nothing on how to give effective feedback to students.


"Literacy" has become "a general skill that could be bolted onto any domain or concept," he learned. That opened the door to "digital literacy, critical literacy, media literacy, and something we talked about ad nauseum called racial literacy."


Traditional literacy was considered outmoded and oppressive. "The usual tools and techniques English teachers employed to teach writing — graphic organizers, rubrics — were actually bludgeons used against disadvantaged students," the professor explained.


The five-paragraph essay was "formulaic and inauthentic," most of the class agreed. It was “Eurocentric.” And “carceral.”


“But maybe its rigid structure actually helps struggling writers?” Hunt said, recalling the "jumbled mess" of essays his students had turned in after three weeks discussing a single poem. He made a pitch for coherence. "Topic sentences. Supporting details. Transitions. Shouldn’t our students learn how to do all this?” (I spent four years in high school learning how to write a 3-3-3 paragraph with topic sentences and supporting details. We hated it. It turned out to be very useful.)


"There is not one way to write," the professor told the class. Teachers' biggest "challenge is to question our deficit mindsets, especially about particular populations of students, and to think deeply about how that informs how we teach writing.” When Hunt asked what that meant, the professor said, “Based on some things you’ve shared, I do wonder how you see the children in your classroom.”


Hunt saw them as students who needed "sound writing instruction from a competent teacher"to have a shot at escaping poverty. The professor and most of his classmates thought they needed teachers "who could eloquently critique the socio-political conditions that had caused that impoverishment." But not teach them the "basic writing skills they themselves possessed and had built upon to succeed in school (and, at least in one case, to secure a lucrative tenure at a prestigious university)."


In the end, he had to teach himself how to teach writing through trial and error and borrowing ideas from colleagues, Hunt writes.


Teacher-prep programs should teach the "coherent body of research-informed principles and techniques" that might be called the Science of Writing, he writes. "It’s not as if this doesn’t exist. It does. Very much so."


Writing instruction was a "hodgepodge" in Douglas County, Colorado schools, writes Hechinger's Jackie Mader. "Teachers didn't know how to teach writing," says literacy coordinator Janet Merrill.  Now the district is training teachers in "evidence-based writing approaches" and seeing state test scores rise for writing -- and math. "Similar efforts are underway in Tennessee, Pennsylvania, California and Rhode Island," she writes.


"While the 'science of writing' isn’t as deeply researched as the science of how children learn to read, experts generally agree" on some practices, Mader notes. "For example, students should be given time each day to write and taught different genres and purposes of writing," and they should "explicitly instruct students in individual components of writing, starting with handwriting, spelling and vocabulary."


However, teacher preparation programs vary in how they prepare new teachers to teach writing, she reports, and some "lack standalone writing instruction courses."


Douglas County teachers were used to asking students to write about a vacation or birthday or "describe your shoe," Merrill told Mader. The new model, called Self-Regulated Strategy Development encourages "students to respond to texts using evidence and giving them specific strategies for planning and organizing writing."


"Federal research has found the SRSD approach improved writing quality across different genres, grades and assignments, and can be an effective intervention for students with learning disabilities," writes Mader. "But despite the evidence behind SRSD and similar approaches based on the science of writing, they haven’t made it into mainstream curricula and classrooms."


Olivia Eastwood, a third-grade teacher, transformed how she teaches writing by using the SRSD model, also known as Releasing Writers. Instead of trying a bit of everything, little of it based on evidence of effectiveness, she is now "confident that what I am teaching is rooted in research -- and I can see it working!"

11 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Bruce William Smith
15 hours ago
Rated 4 out of 5 stars.

Good textbooks can be helpful. I regularly use Singapore Oxbridge ones (that is, those in use in Singapore published by Oxford University Press so as to help students achieve well on Cambridge assessments of the Common Core English language studies standards), as I have used with the students I have to go teach right now (they're waiting for me as I write this).

Edited
Like

James
20 hours ago

When I see how poorly the entire education system is, how is it possible this isn't deliberate? Call me a conspiracy theorist, but it is true that "the purpose of a system is what it does."

I have no time for "intentions."

Like
Guest
2 hours ago
Replying to

It certainly is tempting to think that "keep'em dumb and keep'em down" is the purpose, but it is a really a side effect. The real purpose of education in America is to serve as a jobs program for adults. I have served on several non-profit boards with fairly prominent politicians. As a faculty member, when I look at a school or university, my bias is to look at students and faculty. Besides the teachers in the schools, the politicians see custodians, bus drivers, cafeteria workers, classroom aides, coaches, counselors, and of course, squadrons of administrators. In the average US school district, teachers are fewer than half of the employees. Most of these jobs are the proverbial "clean indoor work with…


Like

Suzanne
a day ago
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

I always thought one of the best ways to learn to write was actually to read a lot of different things.


I'm certainly not against explicit instruction by teachers who've figured out what they're doing, as Mader and Eastwood describe (in the article); but if students (from an early age) have a number of different genres that they can call to mind--"Oh, I'm explaining something, like that article about coral reefs;" "Oh, I'm supposed to tell a story, like Goldilocks and the Three Bears"--that will certainly help them.


I always thought the "peer editing" and constant "journaling", in the elementary or middle-school classroom (which I observed; never had to preside over), were a big waste of time.

Like
Momof4
6 hours ago
Replying to

Sorry for the typos - should have checked before posting

Like

Rob
a day ago

I guess it's different teach a whole class of kids, but my mother had no trouble teaching her kids to read. We would sit on her lap while we read a book with her help, sounding out words as needed. Then, when she was driving us around, she would point to signs, billboards, and such and say, "who can tell me what that says?" All of us could read before first grade. Luckily, none of us had any significant learning disabilities; I'm sure that adds a whole extra layer of problems.

Like

Guest
a day ago
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

The problem is not just in writing. I went to Teachers College back in the past (biggest problem was avoid the brontosaurs) and found that there were almost no classes on how to teach just about every subject besides reading and math. The Social Studies Department had one class on teaching methods and it was a waste. The real problem is that most of the professors have no idea how to teach almost anything! For a while I ran a Special Education Department at a high school and the teachers told me that almost everything they did was measuring disabilities and finding ways to explain how they might be overcome with just about nothing on how to actually teach. …

Like
bottom of page