AI can help teachers with lessons, grading and diagnosing students' learning needs, Chinese educators believe.

There little evidence learning tech aids learning, and many complaints that it's bad for students' attention spans.

Children are starting at screens in school, instead of listening to a teacher or interacting with friends, parents complain.

Toy Story 5 pits a child's old toys with a new tablet that wants to monopolize her playtime.

Student misbehavior is way up, say kindergarten and first-grade teachers. More kids are unprepared to pay attention, cooperate and show respect to classmates and teachers.

The anti-tech backlash is here: Parents are asking to opt their kids out of using school laptops and tablets.

Edtech hasn't improved learning, so far, say critics. And it may encourage students to offload thinking to a bot.

China is using "genius" classes for top math and science students to train AI researchers.

College students need internet-free spaces where they can read, write, talk, think, play and sleep.

Gamifying education might be fun for kids, but they're not likely to learn very much.

The more time students spend on screens the less they learn, argues neuroscientist Jared Cooney Horvath.

To protect teens from digital addiction, parents must take charge.

Students are using Chromebooks and iPads, starting in kindergarten. Most teachers say devices cause distractions.

Instead of trying to be entertainers, teachers should teach students to listen, respond to classmates' ideas and pay attention.

Should we worry that young people are spending less time reading for pleasure and a lot more time watching YouTube videos?

Will San Francisco parents pay $75,000 a year for Alpha's tech-accelerated school?

"Kids aren't phone zombies now," says teacher whose school banned smartphones.

As Americans lose faith in the value of a college education, Silicon Valley is celebrating dropout entrepreneurs.

Meta AI has been designed to flirt with children, as long as it doesn't suggest sexual intercourse.

Lowering the definition of "proficient" reading would end the "reading crisis," writes education professor. But one-third of students are very poor readers.