top of page

Ten Commandments law wins in court: Will idol-worship and adultery rates fall in Texas schools?

  • Writer: Joanne Jacobs
    Joanne Jacobs
  • Apr 25
  • 2 min read

Updated: Apr 25

Texas may require schools to post the Ten Commandments in classrooms, a federal appeals court ruled this week, reports Jaden Edison of the Texas Tribune. On a 9-8 vote, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the law does not establish an official state religion.


A Ten Commandments monument sits at the Texas Capitol.  Photo: Paul Weber/AP
A Ten Commandments monument sits at the Texas Capitol. Photo: Paul Weber/AP

U.S. District Judge Fred Biery had blocked the law from taking effect, saying it favors Christianity and could interfere with families' "exercise of their sincere religious or nonreligious beliefs in substantial ways."


Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton argued that the "Ten Commandments played a significant role in the nation's history and heritage," writes Edison.


A similar Louisiana law was struck down by a federal court last year. It's very, very likely the issue will go to the U.S. Supreme Court.



Well, it will expand their vocabulary. Many of my (Jewish) religious school classmates thought "adultery" was something done by adults, which, though technically true, is an inadequate definition.


I recall a lively discussion about "Thou shalt not steal." Is it OK to steal food if your family is starving? And, naturally, we spent a lot of time on "thou shalt not kill," discussing self-defense and soldiers in combat and the difference between "kill" and "murder."


"Covet" was another vocabulary word. I remember the snickers over that one, because our version said "thou shalt not covet," among other things, "thy neighbor's ass." We thought that was hysterical.


America's moral code is being reframed by progressive hipsters, writes Graeme Wood in The Atlantic. Stealing -- avocados from Whole Foods, art from the Louvre, whatever -- is "resistance," argue streamer Hasan Piker and New Yorker staff writer Jia Tolentino in a New York Times podcast. But ordering coffee in a plastic cup is not.


All three come from wealthy families, writes River Page at The Free Press. "Much has been written about luxury beliefs, but this is a luxury crime: For the rich, shoplifting can be a cheap thrill, because they can bail themselves out of jail immediately — forgoing the no-show firing that would await regular workers — and hire a lawyer if they need to."

5 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Guest
Apr 30

" no, I don't know whether universities generally require an ethics class."


In other words, you don't know what you're talking about.

Like

Guest
Apr 27

Of course, it's a waste of wall space in terms of influencing student behavior in a practical and positive way. The same can be said about the passionate belief of university administrators and trustees who think that forcing all students to take "ethics" will inoculate them against bad behavior. It doesn't work that way.

Like
Heresolong
Apr 29
Replying to

A rude way for you to frame it but that's why I asked the question: no, I don't know whether universities generally require an ethics class. Pretty sure my engineering program in the 80s at a top ranked school didn't, but that was then, this is now.


And I notice you didn't address the question about who claims that ethics classes will "inoculate" them against bad behavior.


None of which proves or even suggests that teaching people, especially young people, about the right thing to do is a waste of time.

Like
bottom of page