Teachers are skeptical of 'equitable' grading: 'Students sink to lower expectations'
- Joanne Jacobs

- Aug 20
- 2 min read

Grades should be based on students' knowledge and skills, with no rewards for classroom participation or completing homework on time, say "equity" advocates. Students should get partial credit for uncompleted assignments and unlimited retakes of tests and quizzes.
Teachers are "skeptical" about“grading for equity,” concludes a Fordham report, which relied on a RAND survey of teachers nationwide. "Turns out, teachers don’t like it when the powers that be take a sledgehammer to their few sources of leverage over student motivation and effort," writes Fordham's Michael Petrilli. "Nor do they like giving students grades they don’t deserve."
Nearly three-quarters of "majority minority" middle schools have adopted a "no zeros" policy. Teachers can't give a zero for an assignment, even if the student never turned it in. Nearly half don't give points for classroom participation.
“Grade inflation is pervasive. It's almost impossible to fail. A’s are passed out like Halloween candy. Whether a student learned anything is nearly irrelevant.” -- teacher
The strongest argument for these reforms is that grades should reward achievement rather than effort and diligence, writes Petrilli. Allowing retakes of tests and rewrites of assignments lets students demonstrate mastery, eventually.
The problem is that students who don't do the work usually don't achieve mastery.
These reforms “tend to reduce expectations and accountability for students, hamstring teachers’ ability to manage their classrooms and motivate students, and confuse parents and other stakeholders who do not understand what grades have come to signify,” wrote Adam Tyner and Meredith Coffey in a Fordham policy brief last year.
The weakest argument is that the way to closing racial achievement gaps requires "shooting the messenger," writes Petrilli. According to "anti-racism" scholar Ibram X. Kendi's reasoning, "any racial disparity — such as the fact that the average Black student’s GPA is nearly half a point lower than the average White student’s — is a sign of racism. Therefore, something must be wrong with the grades."
There's nothing "anti-racist" about the "soft bigotry of low expectations, he writes. It's setting kids up to fail in the real world.
One in four students are chronically absent, he notes. If there's "no reward for participation or penalty for late work," it sends a message that showing up isn't all that important. Doing the work isn't important.
Teachers on the panel complained about pressure from administrators to inflate grades and pass every student. Parents and students expect high grades for little effort. "There has to be accountability," said one teacher. "At this particular moment there is not."
"If districts and states truly want to provide their students a rigorous public education, they must deemphasize graduation and course-passing rates and emphasize external measures of academic success, such as end-of-course exams," the report suggests. As one high school teacher said, "There are many seniors that have failed a class that somehow graduate on time."






The general average grades of the European Baccalaureate represent the best grading system I know of, and we will employ it after students finish their diploma programmes at the end of 12th grade, when final external exam grades become available in August: anything before then, even as calculated to determine whether students qualify to participate in the costume parade that is the typical American high school graduation, is only a progress report meant to inform interested parties (mostly parents, eventually including outside groups, such as employers and universities) how children are progressing to date.
"Grades should be based on students' knowledge and skills" One exit test for each class for 100% of the grade. No partial credit, retakes, exceptions, or excuses. Just like post academic life.
I think the 'equity advocates' who want to change "old-fashioned" grading practices, such as replacing the traditional letter grades (A through F) or the 100-point scale (90% = A-, for example) with just four grades--4 the highest, 1 the lowest--are trying to obfuscate the difference between work that earns a score of 95% and that worth only 75%. That's a huge difference, after all! They're trying to increase the number of students who are "qualified" (i.e., above a minimum standard, set pretty low at that).
The core problem is the socialist propaganda that all humans have equal abilities and thus they will all perform equally, in all situations, if you just treat them the same. It's ludicrous, yet so many people believe. I hate to say this, but in a world governed by Evolution, the most competent tend to come out on top. That's the way the real world functions.
Rather than making teachers do so much extra (unpaid) work of making, proctoring, and grading so many retests, how about just making the final exam be the final course grade? After all, "grades should be based on students' knowledge and skills". I offer this every year, but no one takes me up on it....