top of page
  • Writer's pictureJoanne Jacobs

Fuzzy civics: Teachers don't value knowledge

I learned about separation of powers, checks and balances and the three separate and equal branches of government -- executive, legislative and judicial -- in eighth grade.

When the president signs an executive order because he can't persuade Congress to pass a law, when pundits claim the U.S. Supreme Court isn't the supreme authority on interpreting the Constitution, I think back to the Constitution Test, which we had to pass to get into high school. It's useful stuff.

But only 23 percent of public school teachers see"knowledge of social, political, and civic institutions” as one of the three primary aims of civic education, according to a RAND survey conducted in late 2021. Only 41 percent put "knowledge of citizens’ rights and responsibilities” in the top three.

"What teachers do seem to embrace is a vision of civic education which looks a lot like a content-free celebration of self-actualization," writes Rick Hess, who analyzes the RAND survey in Forbes. It's fuzzy civics.

The most commonly cited aim for civic education, endorsed by two-thirds of teachers, is “promoting students’ critical and independent thinking.” The only other aim named by even half of teachers was “developing students’ skills and competencies in conflict resolution.”
. . . Meanwhile, just 11 percent of educators thought a top-three priority was developing students’ capacity to defend their point of view and only 4 percent said the same of preparing students for future political engagement. . . . If civic education doesn’t involve preparing students to defend their views or engage responsibly in democratic decision-making, just what kind of critical thinking does it entail?

Few teachers see their job as promoting environmental or anti-racist activism, the survey showed.

But students will not be prepared to "engage in crucial debates regarding the proper size of government, the role of the courts, or the right way to balance democratic participation against concerns for election integrity," writes Hess. Thinking about these issues requires "historical understanding and substantive knowledge."

Colorado's state education board voted 4-3 last week to reject American Birthright, a set of K–12 social studies standards, that the Democratic majority said was too conservative, reports Erica Meltzer on Chalkbeat.

“These standards are too extreme for the state of Colorado,” said Democratic board member Lisa Escárcega, explaining her vote against the American Birthright standards.
American Birthright calls out project-based learning, inquiry-based learning, social emotional learning, current events, civic engagement, and any teaching that promotes diversity, equity, inclusion, or social justice as harmful to learning.
. . . Republican board member Joyce Rankin countered that students aren’t getting the grounding in facts they need to engage in more advanced thinking. Rankin described the results of word searches she had done on Colorado civics standards and American Birthright.

American Birthright is a project of the Civics Alliance, a coalition "formed to oppose a “new civics” more centered on global citizenship and activism than on understanding American ideals and responsibilities," writes Meltzer.

The National Association of Scholars, which helped create the standards, issued a statement saying, "Colorado’s board members have paved the way for American Birthright to be considered equally seriously in states around the nation—and to be adopted."

203 views3 comments


Oct 19, 2022

I don't think this is necessarily limited to civics. There seems to be a real aversion among many teachers to teaching knowledge in any subject.

Oct 20, 2022
Replying to

Sadly, this is true.

And it's not just teachers.

And though there are some of us teachers who try to teach, we are often stymied by school/district administrations who tie our hands:

1) keep unruly students in class

2) poor curriculum choices

3) in the name of "equity", no assignment/quiz/test/essay grade can receive less than 50%, even if the student doesn't turn it in

4) waive rules at the last minute, in the absence of any evidence of learning, just so a student graduates and the school/district's graduation rate looks good

There are just a few of the things going on in schools across the country. They say they're not lowering standards, but the evidence says otherwise. A friend …


Oct 19, 2022

In Prince George's County Maryland, we have effort based grading aka anti-racist grading.

For high school science, if a student turns in all classwork and homework on time, complete, and demonstrating a good faith effort (all terminology from the policy) and only takes but never passes a single test or quiz, that student earns a B for the year.

The policy is 60% effort where the student's work does not have to be correct, and 40% for tests and quizzes where no grade can be recorded in the grading software below a 50%.

We now are experiencing record failure.

Th policy is 5121.3 on the school system policy website:

bottom of page