K-12 breaks the $1 trillion barrier: Do schools need more?
- Joanne Jacobs

- Jul 23
- 2 min read
Federal, state and local revenue for K-12 public education hit $1 trillion in the 2023-24 school year Schools had 22 percent more money to spend -- and 1 percent fewer students -- compared to 10 years earlier.

High-poverty and mostly non-white school districts spend more per student than wealthier and whiter districts, according to a new Brookings analysis, writes Amanda Geduld in The 74.
That's not news. It's been true for the past 50 years, primarily due to federal funding. But it challenges a popular narrative the underfunding leads to unequal outcomes, said Sarah Reber, the report's lead author.
“I definitely don’t want to put myself in the ‘money doesn’t matter’ (group), like we shouldn’t care about that at all,” she said. “But I think this idea that people have that obviously the reason that schools that serve poor students are struggling is that they have less money (is) not the case. For one thing they don’t — they have more money.”
Where does the money go? Chad Aldeman explains what happens to the $1 trillion, also on The 74.
In 2023-24, public schools spent $17,619 per student nationwide, but that includes huge variations, he writes. New York and the District of Columbia spent more than $30,000 per student, while Idaho, Utah, Arizona, Oklahoma and Mississippi spent closer to $11,000 or $12,000 per child.
"These figures don’t account for cost-of-living differences, but they reflect real distinctions in how public education looks in various parts of the country, he explains. For example, Vermont "schools employ one full-time staff member for every 4.3 students," and some other states have similar staffing ratios, while "the average school in Utah has 11.3 students for every employee."
In a few states -- Alaska, Montana and Wyoming -- real per-pupil spending fell.
Teachers -- average salary of $72,030 -- aren't getting higher take-home pay in inflation-adjusted dollars. Districts are paying much more in employee benefits. And they're hiring "more teachers and a lot more instructional aides, principals, assistant principals, guidance counselors and student support staff."
Spending is higher at district-run public schools with more low-income and non-white students, Aldeman writes. Often these schools have lots of teachers and support staff, but employees tend to be" less experienced, and thus lower-paid." It's not clear whether high-need students would do better if their schools were staffed with fewer adults but more experienced, higher-paid teachers.
"Crossing the trillion-dollar threshold presents an opportunity to ask harder questions than whether schools simply need more money," he concludes. "Enrollment is falling, spending has risen substantially and staffing has expanded, yet teacher pay has stagnated and student outcomes remain uneven."



I hypothesize that the U.S. spends far more on administration and SPED than other first-world countries. Does anyone have a source for a breakdown that would prove or disprove that hypothesis?
Theodore Dalrymple, "Miracle: A British School That Works", City Journal
Every occasion is a good time to mention the Michaela School. Between the Sudbury Valley School and the Michaels School, there's a curriculum and pace and method of instruction that fits everyone (except, perhaps apprenticeship training). The education industry is a highly unlikely candidate for necessarily rule-bound, bureaucratic State (i.e., government, generally) operation.
Where large US school districts overlap large US cities, the correlation between violent crime rate and revenue per pupil is positive. Why? Revenue per pupil is a proxy for political corruption.
Adjusted for inflation, the US (as a whole) spends 3.5 times as much on public education today as it did in the 1960's and I'm pretty sure students academic ability in middle and high school in the 1960's exceeded students abilities in the 2020's
Throwing more money at something and expecting a better result is a mantra which is owned by government entities...
I remember a quote from Emergency! (1972-1977) episode was Welcome to Santa Rosa County:
Sheriff Bittner - The health commissioner says "Any damn fool can solve the problem with money, but it takes a smart man to do it without"
I wrote in my comment on Mr Aldeman's article, "we should remember that student outcomes worsened over those ten years, while all this per-student spending rose, which suggests inefficiency that a new, zero-based budgeting model like that being developed in One World Education Centre should help replace for the municipalities that should succeed the incompetent school districts spending their ways towards bankruptcy thanks to the taxpayer extortions practised by their labour-union partners"; a solution to this last problem is to be found in regionalized states that replace collective bargaining with regional regulations setting teachers' salaries, benefits, and working conditions in public-authority schools, while private ones negotiate their contracts with their staff in keeping with the practices of the world's leading…