top of page

Job 1: Restore the high school diploma's credibility

  • Writer: Joanne Jacobs
    Joanne Jacobs
  • Jul 20
  • 2 min read

College for all is dead, writes Dale Chu. Now high schools are trying to build career pathways to expand students' options. That's a worthy goal. But it won't work -- nothing will work -- unless schools make the high school diploma mean something. If young people leave K-12 without a strong academic foundation, they won't succeed in job training or college.


Students who coasted to graduation in passenger mode, but earned inflated A's and B's, will struggle to learn a skilled job, Chu writes. Their diplomas signal attendance, not academic proficiency.


Now credit recovery programs get students who couldn't bother to show up to a diploma too. The combination has "made graduation rates one of the least credible metrics in education," Chu writes. "Teachers know this. So do employers."


Restoring the diploma’s credibility should be the centerpiece of both workforce preparation and college preparation," he writes.


College readiness starts in elementary school, argues Mitch Daniels, former Indiana governor and Purdue president. As governor, he pushed for an end to social promotion. "Too many schools choose to shuffle along kids who are not ready, dooming them to struggle and failure later on," he wrote in the Washington Post. "Whenever the K–12 system can devise ways to disguise its shortcomings, it will."


Oregon made a cryingstock of itself by ending proficiency exams for its high school graduates… A lot of losing football coaches in Oregon wish they, too, could just stop keeping score, but, of course, football is too important for such nonsense. -- Mitch Daniels

Chu also advocates higher grading standards, requiring end-of-course exams (not written or graded by the teacher) and higher graduation requirements. Policymakers could use of A–F grading of schools "not only to hold them accountable but also to give parents clearer information about school performance while there is still time to act on it."


Raising expectations earlier in K-12 would make the diploma a reliable signal of college and career readiness.


I can't envision any way to do this with a single diploma. I wonder how many students would earn a real college-ready diploma, if the standards were clear, and how many would qualify for an apprenticeship-ready diploma. And how many would go for the "basic" version, perhaps with a certificate in "ladder safety" or AI prompt-writing.

29 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Bill
Jul 24
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

A high school diploma has been a joke for at least the last 25 to 30 years or so in the United States...


Social promotion, self-esteem mantra and all the BS which passes for education (i.e.- indoctrination) these days is the root cause of this... Joe or Jane can't read in the 3rd grade,

just pass them along so they don't feel bad about themselves, do the same in middle

and high school and you've wasted 12 years of taxpayer dollars (or put another way, 120 to 360

thousand dollars per student, depending on district) producing individuals who aren't prepared for the realities of life beyond high school (life is seldom fair and a hard teacher)...


When I was in…


Edited
Like

Maria
Jul 23
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

great

Like

Guest
Jul 21

Once again, the race card. Nowhere did I or the other poster deny nor imply that there are differences between racial groups. As usual, you are simply making stuff up. In your response above, you employ the familiar dodge of changing the subject. The subject of the thread is about restoring the credibility of a high school diploma, not 4th and 8th grade NAEP scores.


The issue, of course, is first to get as many students as possible to a level of proficiency so that they can function as literate and numerate adults and then to ensure that those aiming at advanced education have the necessary starting skills to be successful. The easiest way to eliminate the "gaps" that you…


Like
Guest
Jul 24
Replying to

You offer no evidence whatsoever that raising standards will inevitably increase what you call "THE achievement gap." You simply offer assertions instead, and then ask people who disagree with you to prove a negative. You believe that there is a single "achievement gap," when in fact there are many different measures, and whether a "gap" is meaningful in practical terms is open to question. Since the AI you employ generally spews about NAEP, let's look at the "gender gap" in 8th grade mathematics, which is exactly the kind of gap you yap about.


Between 2000-2024, the gap on a national basis has ranged from 0-4 points. In the non-zero years, males have had the edge. In 2000, males' average scale…


Like

JKBrown
Jul 21
I wonder how many students would earn a real college-ready diploma, if the standards were clear, and how many would qualify for an apprenticeship-ready diploma.

Well, that's easy, the ones good at doing math but not interested in math theory, who have a penchant for problem solving and like to work with things instead of word will qualify for apprenticeships. Those who are not good at math are "college-ready" for the Liberal or Fine Arts and most of the social sciences.


The only real solution is independent testing that none of the "educators" can influence. Basically the UK GCSE  - General Certificate of Secondary Education 

an examination set especially for secondary-school pupils of about age 16 in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland, at a level below A level [Advanced…

Like

Guest
Jul 21

Didn't New York State have a multi-tiered diploma system? Do they still?

Like
Joanne Jacobs
Joanne Jacobs
Jul 22
Replying to

Yes, I agree.

Like
bottom of page