top of page

Is Common Core math the problem?

  • Writer: Joanne Jacobs
    Joanne Jacobs
  • Aug 28
  • 2 min read

From The Phantom Tollbooth movie (1970)
From The Phantom Tollbooth movie (1970)

Despite declining math scores, many states have stuck with the Common Core, writes Jo Napolitano on The 74. Advocates credit the standards, which rolled out 15 years ago, with teaching conceptual understanding and "building an on-ramp to algebra from arithmetic."


The Common Core emphasize student thinking, says Dave Kung, executive director at Transforming Post-Secondary Education in Mathematics. The National Assessment of Educational Progress and state tests often reflect “straightforward procedural stuff,” he told Napolitano. “If a student lost a little bit of that, I’m kind of OK with that if what they gained is a better understanding of what is going on.”


Teachers struggled with the new approach, and parents complained they couldn't help their children with homework, writes Napolitano. "It took years in many cases for schools to create or adopt the curriculum needed to support the standards."


But, even as many states revamp their standards to combat poor student performance, the Common Core's approach has survived, with some modifications, she writes.


Milwaukee Public Schools embraced the Common Core, says Mary Mooney, now a state mathematics education consultant. “Everybody was challenged with these standards to think differently about mathematics,” she said, adding some teachers didn’t realize multiplication was so closely tied to elements of geometry. “That was the power of the Common Core. But you really needed good professional learning to see the beauty and power in those standards.”


Teachers rethought the goal of math fluency, which is related to speed, says Mooney. “When you think about being fast, you tend to have memorization as the only strategy for understanding your facts. We added ‘flexible’ and ‘efficient,’ which helped teachers … to teach the math behind the facts and not simply getting an answer.”


Wisconsin's math scores are above the national average, but the state has the widest racial achievement gap in the country. Test scores in Milwaukee are "alarming," writes Alan Borsuk in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. "Eight percent of MPS eighth-graders scored proficient or better in math, while 22% scored at the basic level and 70% scored below basic" on the 2024 National Assessment of Education Progress.


Wisconsin has largely stuck with the Common Core, writes Napolitano. Other states have moved on.


Archimedes
Archimedes

"Oklahoma and Florida are among those that dropped the standards — Sunshine State leaders were gleeful about abandoning what they called 'crazy math',” she writes.


Louisiana changed a 21% of the standards in 2016. "Fourth graders saw their NAEP scores jump six points between 2022 and 2024 while eighth graders moved a single point. State schools chief Cade Brumley credited the state’s back-to-basics approach for students’ success."


Georgia moved to its own standards two years ago, and credits the change with rising test scores.


Pushing "conceptual understanding at the expense of procedural fluency" is a mistake that leaves students confused, argues Barry Garelick, a middle-school math teacher who literally wrote the book on traditional math.


15 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Micha Elyi
Sep 11

(1) Common Core is a set of achievement standards, not a set of teaching techniques. Virtually all critics of the latest fad teaching techniques blame Common Core. That is an error.


(2) New teaching techniques should be tried first on a small scale and if they appear to be promising then rolled out slowly only after the teachers themselves have been fully taught and brought up to speed on the new techniques. Hastily blowing out a new teaching scheme nationwide after a few early results in elite schools is a recipe for failure. Hasn't anybody in the teaching colleges learned anything from the USA's New Math catastrophe of the 1960s?


(3) Heard in a college teacher preparation class: "Why do…

Like

Ann in L.A.
Aug 29

There is a glaring omission in the "Algebra is an on-ramp" article: algebra pass rates. If it is so good at prepping students for algebra, you would think they'd be able to show, and be proud of, an increase in pass rates, and make that a centerpiece of the article. {{crickets}}

Like

Malcolm Kirkpatrick
Malcolm Kirkpatrick
Aug 29
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

Children are not standard.

What topics should the 7th grade Math curriculum cover?

Ask this question and many people will look back on their middle school years.

What Math should my neighbor's 13 year-old homeschooled daughter study?

Ask this question and people will understand that the answer must be tailored to the individual. When "should" the Math sequence introduce the notation of Set Theory and Logic? When should the sequence introduce combinatorics or Synthetic Geometry?

Why suppose that any prescribed curriculum will fit all children of age X (for any X)?

Whatever the prescribed curriculum, any prescribed pace of instruction will move too slow for some children and too fast for others.

Why suppose that any politically-imposed curriculum and pace…

Like

Malcolm Kirkpatrick
Malcolm Kirkpatrick
Aug 29
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

The basic problem is the US State-monopoly school system. The US needs a minimally-regulated profit-driven competitive market in education services.

Markets (the system of title and contract law) and federalism (subsidiarity, many local policy regimes) institutionalize humility on the part of State (i.e., government, generally) actors.

If a policy dispute turns on a matter of taste, competitive markets and federalism leave room for the expression of varied tastes, while the contest for control of a State-monopoly provider must inevitably create unhappy losers (who may comprise a majority; imagine the outcome of a State0wide vote on the one size and style of shoes we all must wear).

If a policy dispute turns on a matter of fact, where "What works?" is…


Like
Malcolm Kirkpatrick
Malcolm Kirkpatrick
Aug 30
Replying to

There are too many "r"s in "revolution". Incremental change can happen quickly. I support policies which shift control over K-12 education from institutions to individual parents. Parent Performance Contracting requires no new administrative machinery, admits incremental implementation along several dimensions, enhances overall system financial and performance accountability, and elides the church/state argument.

Search "The Harriet Tubman Agenda, The Proposal".

The only thing missing is on-the-job training, as in Germany and Switzerland. I would welcome suggestions on how to include this.

Compulsory school attendance laws mean nothing in a competitive market in education services where customers (i.e., parents) and providers (schools, employers) meet on mutually agreeable terms unless, for every student whom all other schools reject, there is some school which…

Edited
Like

Rob
Aug 28
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

If your students aren't learning, then either your curriculum or you teachers (or both) are bad. We successfully taught math for centuries using a standard set of algorithms and teaching methods. Then, we decided to hell with all that, we'll try something new and untested. Well, it didn't work, hustle back to the old methods and quit being chowderheads.

Like
Suzanne
Sep 08
Replying to

I think you can fairly look to elite education from the past, for some potentially good ideas.


Bring them to as many students today as can profit.

Like
bottom of page