top of page

Blaming the test is racist: Expand gifted programs, free tutoring

  • Writer: Joanne Jacobs
    Joanne Jacobs
  • Jul 22
  • 3 min read

Of 777 students admitted to New York City's elite Stuyvesant High this year, three are black and 21 are Latino. Admission is based on a test. Period. Most of the high scorers come from Asian families, often immigrants with modest incomes and large ambitions.


Stuyvesant High students Photo: Christopher Lee/New York Times
Stuyvesant High students Photo: Christopher Lee/New York Times

Don't blame the test, writes John McWhorter, a Columbia University linguist, in a New York Times op-ed. Above all, don't argue that the analytical reasoning required by tests is "incompatible with Blackness."


Blacks make up 19 percent of public-school enrollment, he notes. Many argue that the standards must be unfair and that the Specialized High School Admissions Test should be dropped.


Black students often come from poor or working-class families and attend low-performing schools, McWhorter writes. But "poverty rates for Black, Latino and Asian New Yorkers are not that different."


"The sons and daughters of Asian immigrants, even if undocumented," go to the same schools, but qualify for elite high schools "at far higher rates than even white students," he writes. Seventy-one percent of students are Asian; 19 percent of the city's public school students are Asian. (Whites are about 16 percent of enrollment, 17 to 20 percent of Stuyvesant students.)


McWhorter has several theories on why the number of black students at elite high schools has gone down since the 1970's and 80's.


Programs like Prep for Prep recruit promising minority students, provide "an after-school and weekend preparatory boot camp for 14 months" and get them scholarships to private high schools, he writes. In addition, private schools, boarding schools and parochial schools offer scholarships to increase the diversity of their privileged student bodies. Many of these student might otherwise be applying to Stuyvesant.


McWhorter also blames the antitracking movement of the '90s for placing denying achievers a chance to be taught in faster-paced classes. "Black families are often not aware that New York City has free programs helping students prepare for the test, such as the New York City public schools’ DREAM program."


Asian families are heavy users of tutoring and test prep. They see the city's selective public high schools as the best route to success.


Selective universities went test-optional or test-blind during the pandemic, and are now restoring SAT/ACT requirements, writes McWhorter. It turned out that testing is the most "effective way to identify less advantaged students who would likely excel in college."


Subjective criteria, such as essays, extracurriculars and recommendations, favor the advantaged (and/or the dishonest). The "service trip" to Guatemala scores more points than the after-school job at McDonald's to help your Guatemalan parents pay the rent.


What really annoys McWhorter, who is black, is the idea that "tests of abstract cognitive ability" are inherently unfair to blacks. That includes a black educator saying that blacks “are context-driven people” and that “there’s no such thing as thinking in isolation,” and a black professor telling him it's racist for academic journals and conferences to require more statistical analysis because “that’s not what we do.”

In How to Be an Antiracist, Ibram X. Kendi opposes giving standardized tests and asks: “What if we measured intelligence by how knowledgeable individuals are about their own environments? What if we measured intellect by an individual’s desire to know?”


McWhorter adds that Glenn Singleton, a black diversity trainer, calls "scientific linear thinking" "a hallmark of whiteness."


To the professor, that sounds racist: "Black people are less intelligent than others and should settle for excellence in sports and entertainment but not academia."


Keep the test, and look for ways to improve black students' achievement, McWhorter concludes. "Expand, don’t shrink, the number of gifted and talented programs. Expand and strengthen free, city-run test prep and tutoring."



Her grandmother, who'd arrived in New York City in 1939 as a three-year-old refugee from Austria, passed the test to get into Bronx Science, which led to Barnard and law school. The city’s competitive specialized high school system is "an engine of immigrant mobility and opportunity," writes Piper. "You just take a test and prove what you can do."


As mayor in 2018, Bill de Blasio "proposed replacing test-based admissions with admitting the top 7% of each middle school," Piper writes. "Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who himself attended Bronx Science, had entertained SHSAT abolition during his campaign for state Assembly, but this week he took a much smarter approach, calling for more work to ensure that all middle schoolers are well prepared for the SHSAT."


14 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Momof4
Jul 23

If I remember correctly, offering free tutoring and/or prep for Stuvysant etc. has been offered, in the past, but few blacks or Hispanics participated. It was mostly Asians - hardly a surprise.

I would like to see more k-8 gifted programs (not just “enrichment” but more, deeper material and a faster pace; including acceleration), without lowering standards, and placing gifted programs in separate schools; by MS, if not earlier, to reduce the opportunities for targeting such students as Oreos, coconuts, sellouts etc. by their academically uninterested age-mates; who have considered academic achievement, and the behaviors enabling it, to be undesirable. Open and widen the pipeline and don’t allow the unable and/or unmotivated to derail the able and willing.


Like
Bill
Jul 24
Replying to

In my day in high school we had tracking (grouping students by ability) based on stanine scores (1-3 low, 4-6 average, 7-9 high) for testing done in 8th grade to determine what classes you could enroll in as a 9th grader...


The students who were continual troublemakers in class usually got started at the Dean's office with an RPC (Required Parent Conference) and if the problems continued, they were shipped off to what was known as Opportunity School with plenty of security standing around and very few privileges (compared to a regular school).


The legal dropout age when I attended was 16, so many students who didn't want to be in school simply didn't come back after the 10th grade…


Like

lady_lessa
Jul 23

An interesting way to test McWhorter's theory about other schools siphoning minority students away from Stuyvesant would be to look at the numbers before and after programs like "Prep for Prep". Also check graduation rates, and post HS life. I hope that the prep work would increase graduation rates, and good jobs after college. (I am also assuming that grade inflation and content decrease are not factors. If they are, the numbers have much less meaning)

Like
superdestroyer
Jul 23
Replying to

Here are the demographics for the Dalton School in NYC which is at the top of the private college prep schools according to Niche (N = 1330).


  • White 43.6%

  • Multiracial 20.2%

  • Asian 18.2%

  • African American 10.5%

  • Hispanic 7.4%


Thus, the Dalton School is 20x more black than Stuyvesant High School. For comparison, here is the demographics of the Bronx High School for Science, another of the Specialized High Schools Admissions Test schools in NYC. (again, from Niche)


  • Asian 60.3%

  • White 19.7%

  • Hispanic 10.1%

  • African American 5.5%

  • Multiracial 3.4%


Also, the prep work is about getting admission to an SHSAT exam high school and not really about high school graduation or occupations after high school. The entire point of going t…


Like

superdestroyer
Jul 22

Maybe New York state should adopt something like Texas's top ten percent rule. If every school in New York state (public and private) were forced to rank their students from 1 to the bottom, parents (and especially the Asian parents) might want to make sure that their child does not end up in an overmatched situation where their child ends up in the bottom of the high school rankings. No one really believes that a student who finishes 700th in their Stuyvesant High School graduation classes stands any chance of getting into MIT or Cal Tech. If one is just going to end up majoring in electrical engineering at Stony Brook University.

Like
superdestroyer
Jul 27
Replying to

Texas started ranking high school graduating classes in 1997 as part of the top ten percent rule that was passed in response to Hopwood V Texas. Private schools were included if those schools wanted their graduates to qualify for the top ten percent rule.


From Google AI: Few U.S. states have broad statutory mandates requiring every public high school to rank all students, but specific states enforce ranking for automatic college admissions or policy rules, including Texas, Wisconsin, and Maryland.


Also, one of the biggest issues in education policy is parents, grandparents, or just average citizens viewing current education policy through the lens of their own experiences from decades ago.

Like
bottom of page