top of page

Reading, math scores are out: 'The news is not good'

Writer's picture: Joanne JacobsJoanne Jacobs

U.S. fourth-graders are doing worse than ever in reading on the "nation's report card." Lower achievers have hit new lows, continuing a decline that started before the pandemic, reports Sarah Schwartz in Education Week. Reading scores also fell for eighth-graders on the 2024 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).


"The drop from the historic low scores of 2022 comes despite an unprecedented infusion of federal funding that flowed into schools, fueling tutoring and other interventions aimed at addressing learning loss," she writes.



Math scores stayed at the low 2022 level for eighth-graders and rose slightly for fourth-graders, but remain below pre-pandemic levels.


High achievers improved slightly, while low achievers did much worse, widening achievement gaps. Hispanic students lost the most, probably because English Learners did poorly in remote learning.


“The news is not good,” Peggy Carr, the commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics, which administers NAEP, said in a call with reporters on Tuesday.


There were only a few bright spots. Louisiana, which has focused on improving instruction, saw fourth-grade reading scores exceed pre-pandemic averages, and Alabama did better than pre-pandemic averages in fourth-grade math.


One-third of eighth-graders tested "below the Basic threshold" in reading, the most in the history of the exam," notes Kevin Mahnken on The 74.


Below-Basic students "likely can’t tell us the main idea of a text,” said Julia Rafal-Baer, a member of NAEP's governing board. “They can’t draw any explicit features from that text." They are at high risk to fail in high school.


Forty percent of fourth-graders tested as below Basic in reading.


Are you smarter than a fourth-grader? Go here to take a pop quiz in various subjects at the fourth- or eighth-grade level.

570 views5 comments

Recent Posts

See All

5 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Mike
Jan 31

The selections on Ohio's state tests were boring.


That's why students performed poorly? Okay...

Like
RhoH
Jan 31
Replying to

I simplified it, obviously. Starting with NCLB, the $$$$$ that enriched pushing all that entailed into state education agencies, training and seminars through regional and county organizations, books and programs to implement the changes in classrooms (huge expense)--the list of wasted money is endless. The pressure on teachers to get good scores from their students, on schools to show high scores, on districts as scores were posted without much information on the population and income levels in the district, was very damaging. For one example, instead of students reading a wide variety of literature, informative reading became the focus. Informative reading is important, but time restraints and test pressures found other literary choices replaced by reading PARTS of great novels…

Like

RhoH
Jan 30

Retired English teacher here wondering what reading scores would be if those tests actually were interesting selections about things kids like. The selections on Ohio's state tests were boring. I had many students who were great readers who loathed them! Common Core took out the heart of reading and reduced it to mechanical reading.

Like

Rob
Jan 29

Well, at least the poor performance comes at great expense...

Like
bottom of page