top of page
  • Writer's pictureJoanne Jacobs

Malice: STEM students mock trans survey

Asked their gender, race and disability status, a surprising number of engineering and computer science students identify as military helicopters, report Oregon State researchers. That means they're fascists, according to Attack Helicopters and White Supremacy, published in the Bulletin of Applied Transgender Studies.


AH-64 Apache Longbow helicopter

Oregon State University researchers set to survey transgender and gender non-conforming (TNGC) engineering/CS students, but academic journals rejected their paper. Instead, they wrote a paper on "malicious" responses in 50 out of 349 questionnaires.


Twenty-four percent of malicious responders said their gender was a helicopter or aircraft, ranging from an "Apache Attack Helicopter" to a "V22 Osprey," the paper reported.


Respondents were offered a $5 gift card for filling out the survey. One respondent filled in "gift card" as a gender, "ethnic gift card" as a racial/ethnic identity and "I don’t have enough gift cards" as a disability.


Researchers concluded that sarcastic and offensive responses are evidence that "fascist ideologues" are "living 'inside the house' of engineering and computer science," writes Alexander Hall on Fox News


"Online memes associated with white nationalist and fascist movements were present throughout the data, alongside memes and content referencing gaming and ‘nerd’ culture," the researchers wrote.


A graduate student who served as the primary data analyst suffered "personal distress," researchers complained. "As a transgender woman who was already in therapy for anxiety and depression regarding online anti-trans rhetoric," she had to take time off the project "to heal from traumatic harm."


Is this a hoax? I thought so at first, but the authors and the journal seem to exist. If it's a hoax, somebody went to a lot of work.


The paper quotes serious objections to the project, such as "My skin color is not important" and "Everyone is a grab bag of genetics from all over the world." One response is quoted in full:

… I believe that is what is wrong with higher education. Students should be taught to focus on their chosen field and not their gender. In my program I’m sure there are students that fall into the categories you are researching, but their performance is how they are judged. Stop trying to push gender and convince people that they are more important or discriminated against because how they identify. Let people choose their own path and don’t force them into fields because you think a group isn’t represented enough. In today’s world people can be what they want to be regardless of their gender or race, all you’re doing is propagating a stereotype and pushing a divide between groups. Also, the fact that you are funded by the NSF is an enormous waste and not science, that money could be used for real research that could actually better things.

NSF stands for the National Science Foundation.


The academics prescribe "social justice STEM education" that includes "perspectives on online hate radicalization and center anti-colonial, intersectional solidarity organizing as its opposition" to counter fascism in engineering.

Engineers, they noted, "frequently work in fields such as fossil fuels, defense, construction, and technology upon graduation, and could be taught about these field’s relationships with national and global racial capitalism and ongoing apartheid in Palestine, as an example."


At this point, I went back to my original suspicions: It's got to be a parody.


All five authors describe themselves as "queer," four as transgender and three as disabled. Four of the five authors are transgender, and the fifth is "white, cisgender, queer, and disabled." The only non-white author is "light-skinned, multiracial (Indigenous/Black/white), queer, trans feminine, and disabled."

424 views5 comments

5 Comments


Guest
Aug 05, 2023

Well done engineers.

The only and correct response to this pseudo science claptrap and its ridiculous practitioners is to point and reinforce the pointing with much laughter.


Like

Guest
Jul 24, 2023

It's real: https://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaeh/

Like

Guest
Jul 23, 2023

Also, don't be deceived by the authors' names or descriptions. That is accepted in academia, if not required, these days.


Here is a paper that drives the Drag shows for young children. Not the 2nd author


Drag pedagogy: The playful practice of queer imagination in early childhood Harper Keenan & Lil Miss Hot Mess


Harper Keenan & Lil Miss Hot Mess (2020) Drag pedagogy: The playful practice of queer imagination in early childhood, Curriculum Inquiry, 50:5, 440-461, DOI: 10.1080/03626784.2020.1864621

Like

Guest
Jul 23, 2023

I'm told we are in the midst of an existential global climate emergency. The only people who can save humanity are engineers. Why are these researchers being permitted to interrupt the training of these engineers? It's almost like climate change isn't a real threat. It's all hands on deck. Studies such as this are an impediment to the salvation of humanity by engineers, both those working or those training.


JK Brown

Like

Guest
Jul 22, 2023

"At this point, I went back to my original suspicions: It's got to be a parody. "


Today it can be difficult to distinguish between some serious positions and parodies of those positions.


Northwestern is a "real" university and the journal that this article appeared in seems to be somehow connected to Northwestern. See here:


https://sites.northwestern.edu/northwesternlibrary/2023/07/18/one-year-after-debut-applied-transgender-studies-journal-continues-to-build-bridges/


for a one year retrospective of the journal.


I think the article is serious, not parody. Though today ... who can be sure?


-Mark Roulo

Like
bottom of page