top of page

If you aren't teaching kids to read and do math, you don't care about 'equity'

  • Writer: Joanne Jacobs
    Joanne Jacobs
  • Apr 17
  • 2 min read

San Francisco's push to improve reading isn't going well, reports Ezra Wallach in the San Francisco Standard. "The district has invested $5 million in a coaching initiative, pushed out a new standardized curriculum, and set ambitious proficiency targets," he writes.


But literacy rates have slid lower, and a report to the school board warned the effort is “significantly off track” after two years. Among other things, a third of teachers aren’t using the new curriculum.


Since San Francisco Unified is trying to emulate Mississippi's reading reforms, Wallach asked Rachel Canter, formerly of Mississippi First and now head of education policy at the Progressive Policy Institute, to evaluate the district report. In a PPI study and an Atlantic article, Canter has written about why other states are struggling to duplicate the "Mississippi marathon."


California hasn't committed to helping districts change, Canter says. "Are teachers being coached? How frequently, and by whom? How bought in are school administrators? Who is responsible for making sure teachers actually use the materials — and why haven’t they done that?"


San Francisco Unified says its goal is "equity," says Wallach.


That's just talk, Canter responds. "When people tell me they deeply care about equity, and then they’re not willing to hold adults accountable for solving the problem, they don’t deeply care about equity. I want to see the action. What are you willing to do? Who are you willing to hold accountable?"


The primary mission of schools is academic preparation. If you are successfully teaching kids to read and do math, nobody is going to care whether you also have an ethnic studies curriculum. The issue is whether you are serving your fundamental purpose.

Politicians don't want to make people mad, she says. "The easiest way . . . is to say the right things and do nothing, but that’s why kids can’t read."


Mississippi holds schools and districts accountable by publicizing A-F ratings based on student proficiency and growth in reading and math, Canter says. The state intervenes in low-rated schools, and eventually takes over the district.


Students are held accountable by the third-grade reading gate: They can't advance to fourth grade without basic reading skills. Parents must be notified about their child's reading progress three times a year. "That creates a certain kind of urgency," says Canter. "We gave adults in the system real pressure and real fire to get the job done."

18 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Bill
Apr 20

I have said this many times before and will continue to say it:


The US (individual states) does NOT have compulsory EDUCATION laws, they have compulsory ATTENDANCE laws, which are quite a different thing. Individual states provide funding to each school district based on enrollment when count day occurs (which is the day that official enrollment is taken for purposes of state funding of public K-12 education, which is typically in October in most districts)


Never mind that K-12 enrollment will continue to fall in most districts for at least the next 5-10 years due to the overall decline in the US birth rate due to the great recession of 2008-2010, and families having fewer kids (the current birth rate…


Like

Suzanne
Apr 18
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

One of the big problems (for our society as a whole) is that plenty of people who're running education these days would not agree that "The primary mission of schools is academic preparation" (quoting from the article above).


Too many people want to take advantage of the presence of children in schools--enforced by attendance laws; incentivized by the gov't which pays on the basis of attendance--to effect their idealized, ideological goals. Or some pale facsimile of them, anyway.


(Mere) education isn't enough, for them. And so literacy, numeracy, and other basic concepts of our civilization aren't being passed along.

Like

Bruce William Smith
Apr 18
Rated 2 out of 5 stars.

Why didn't anyone put pressure on Mississippi's eighth grade teachers to get their job done? If I'm teaching ninth grade English (which I have taught for many years) in that state, and I don't see any improvements in the incoming reading scores from a state that still ranks below California at that grade level, why should I listen to this repeated myth of a Mississippi marathon that produced no miracle, especially when there are better curricula available elsewhere in the English-speaking world?

Like
Bruce William Smith
Apr 21
Replying to

Millions, when you count the University of California: my family migrated from Indiana, where I was born, in the 1960s, when the California Master Plan for Higher Education expanded UC from two to nine campuses, which was also the decade when California passed New York to become the most populous American state, and when California's public schools had the reputation of being not bad, a reputation they have been steadily losing.

Like

superdestroyer
Apr 18

The issue with equity is that students master subjects to different levels. Yet, progressives are so scared of being called a racist that they will do just about anything to prevent identifying racial/ethnicity gaps in achievement, success, or discipline.


Conservatives are more willing to accept achievement gaps but just want to do everything they can to hide those gaps or just find a way to blame the teachers unions.

Like
Jack Clomps
Apr 21
Replying to

"...most Americans believe that there is a single gimmick that will close the gap."


You have proof for this assertion as usual, correct?

Like

Heresolong
Apr 17

If you don't train teachers on how to use a particular curriculum, they may or may not be able to implement it effectively.


If you don't convince teachers that the new curriculum will be effective, they may or may not use it.


We adopted a curriculum in our Middle School that vertically aligned with the successful curriculum we had used for years in the High School. We saw no impact on incoming students, then found out later that they weren't using it at all. Turned out they'd had no training, didn't understand how it was supposed to work, and decided it included too much reading. The training would have dealt with all those issues as the curriculum included vocabulary promp…


Like
bottom of page