top of page

Every teacher is saying, 'How did he graduate? He didn't do anything'

Writer: Joanne Jacobs
Joanne Jacobs
Sep 22
3 min read


In 2025, South Carolina’s high school graduation rate hit a high of 87 percent, reports Hechinger's Ariel Gilreath. But only a third of seniors were college ready by graduation, based on their test scores and classwork. "More than 1 in 5 students in the state were chronically absent from school — nearly double the rate of chronic absenteeism in the state prior to the pandemic."


South Carolina is trying to raise expectations. A new state law bans schools from setting "grade floors," which set a minimum of 40 or 50 out of 100 instead of zero, even if no work is turned in. The idea is to persuade students who get a slow start not to give up on a passing grade.


But students have figured out they can pass with very little work, says Patrick Kelly, director of governmental affairs with the Palmetto State Teachers Association and a high school history teacher.


“At any high school graduation, I promise you, there will be a child who walks across the stage where every teacher in the room is going to go, ‘Wait, how did they graduate? They didn’t do anything,’” said Kelly.

Texas passed a similar law in 2009, writes Gilreath.


The South Carolina law also states that students must turn in missing assignments before they become eligible for credit-recovery programs, which let them make up classes they failed, often via online worksheets.


That could raise dropout rates says, Susan Stevens, assistant superintendent for school leadership in Greenville County, which set a grade floor more than a decade ago. The district will rethink how to support students at risk of failure.


“South Carolina teachers would tell you that policies like grade floors, credit recovery and content recovery — in the way that they’ve been implemented — are leading to students getting diplomas that have no value beyond the paper they’re printed on,” says Kelly.


Nationwide, grades "have been rising for decades, while scores on standardized tests have stagnated or fallen," reports Gilreath.


The average high school GPA is 3.36, says ACT. Those not-so-prepared "B" students are pushing grade inflation at the college level, says Fordham's David Griffith. “It’s hard to hold the line at the higher ed level if you have kids coming into higher ed who are less prepared than they used to be.”


For younger students, minimum grades mislead parents into thinking their children are doing well, says Dena Crews, president of the state teachers' union. Students don't get extra help to fill in learning gaps in the early grades, then struggle in middle and high school.


More than one-quarter of teachers work in a school with a “no zeros” grading policy, according to a recent survey. It's part of a movement known as "equitable grading," which also includes flexible deadlines and retakes of tests.


 Remote schooling "supercharged" the idea, says Fordham's Griffith. "Frankly, teachers didn’t have much choice. What were they going to do, flunk every kid in America?”


There are incentives for schools to go along. Schools look better on their state report cards, if the failure rate is low, said Derek Lewis, a former school board member of Greenville County Schools and father of a high school student in the district. But reducing F grades may not "necessarily equate to better learning,” Lewis said. “We focus on what we measure.”


San Francisco schools dropped a “Grading for Equity" plan last year after public outcry, reports Han Li in the San Francisco Standard. It included "allowing students to retake tests; excluding factors like lateness, effort, and participation from final grades; omitting classwork and homework from grading; and basing 100% of the grade on 'summative' testing."


The idea has popped up in the East Bay's high-performing Tri-Valley districts, reports Sarah Ravani in the San Francisco Chronicle. But education officials have rebranded rebranded by removing the word "equity."


The grading approach "allows students multiple retakes, reduces how often zeros are given on tests and eliminates extra credit, among other changes — while scrubbing any mention of the word that has made the movement politically radioactive," Ravani writes. The approved terms are “standards-based grading,” “mastery-based assessment” or “grade reform.”


 However, even under new names, Dublin Unified has decided not to test eliminating zeroes and starting passing grades at 50%, she writes. There was too much parent opposition.

19 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
superdestroyer
Sep 24

There cannot be any teachers who fail to understand that school boards, local politicians, upper management of a school system, and parents who find it much easier to accept low standards rather than higher failure/retention/transfer to alternative high school rates.

Like
superdestroyer
Sep 28
Replying to

How else should one take " teachers who don't bother teaching" except that a skilled teacher can teach anyone. Or maybe the original sentence needs to be more nuanced and not promise outcomes that cannot be achieved.

Like

Pete EE
Sep 23

There are half a dozen scandalous practices in this article. Grade floors are not one of them. I have never worked in a system with grade floors, but I have suggested them as an improvement over the other things we do to pass students. They sound like a mathematical trick to avoid a perverse outcome.

Imagine a course with two major essays . Our student doesn't hand in the first one. On the second, she gets 94%. What should her grade be?

Her writing ability is at the A+ level, though we don't know if she can do that consistently, or under time pressure. Straight math says (94 + 0)/2 = 47%: she fails. "Assess the data you have" says…


Like
Bill
Sep 25
Replying to

In two of my science classes in high school, the teacher (same for both classes) graded on 1000 points per quarter with 100 points of extra credit)...


Each day you were late with an assignment you lost 10 percent... On the fifth day don't bother...


Also not turning in an assignment resulted in a zero unless you had an excused absence (i.e. - doctor appt, planned vacation before hand, family illness or death, etc)

Like

Suzanne
Sep 22
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

The thing I never really understood, as a teacher, when the "Equitable Grading" stuff came in, was how a student who's focused on retaking a quiz or test, or redoing an assignment, handles the fact that the class has moved on, in the meantime, to a brand-new unit with its own set of quizzes, tests, and assignments?


How helpful is it, in other words, to allow a student to relearn material after a failure, if this is going to keep him out of the ongoing work of the class?


(More helpful would be to have slower-paced versions of the classes for the students who struggle; and maybe it would take them more than one year to 'earn the credit'. Yikes!--…


Like
Pete EE
Sep 23
Replying to

I have used test rewrites for students with a real change of heart. The most common scenario is a student who is seeing for the first time a grade that is not an A. They realize the standards are higher than they are used to and they up their game.

Retests don't work out well for students who just want to give it another try.

Like

Bill
Sep 22

Use the minimum passing grade for the US military academies as a cutoff score


Anything less than 70% is failing by those standards...


I remember the dang whining by parents and students when they were failing

the HSPE (High School Proficiency Exam) in Nevada, despite having 7 attempts

to pass it in each subject tested, reading, writing math and science), once you

passed in one subject, you didn't have to take the exam again...


Math (no surprise) was the biggest issue with many students, their parents and

state legislators who finally eliminated the exams starting with the class of

2017 and going forward...


Many kids who receive (not earn mind you) a high school diploma aren't prepared

for the world…


Edited
Like

JK Brown
Sep 22

I just wonder if even exposing the scam of schooling will save that many kids by waking up parents and students to the fact that what is taught and rewarded in school has little to do with what is needed to be successful in life.


Will more students save themselves from the damage of their schooling? Or will more students just put all their faith in "I did everything they told me to do and was rewarded all along the way" we hear so often from college graduates?

Like
bottom of page