top of page

Are children learning? Politicians don't seem to care

  • Writer: Joanne Jacobs
    Joanne Jacobs
  • May 13
  • 2 min read

Republicans have gone all in on school choice, giving parents the ability to buy the schooling they prefer for their children. Democrats support whatever the teachers' unions want. But neither party has an education policy centered on student achievement, writes Dana Goldstein in the New York Times.


Galileo
Galileo

Politicians may argue about library books, locker rooms and privilege walks, but not about tackling the lowest reading scores in decades or how to recover from the pandemic, she writes.


“Right now, there are no education goals for the country,” said Arne Duncan, who served as President Barack Obama’s first secretary of education after running Chicago’s public school system. “There are no metrics to measure goals, there are no strategies to achieve those goals and there is no public transparency.”


“There is no talk of achievement gaps, and little talk even of upward mobility or opportunity,” said Michael Petrilli, the president of the Fordham Institute and a former education official under President George W. Bush.


"Far from the spotlight of national politics," Goldstein reports on a racially and economically diverse Louisiana school that's adopted a knowledge-rich curriculum. Fifth-grade teacher Lauren Cascio reviewed vocabulary words -- heretic, rational, skepticism, heliocentric -- for a discussion on the Renaissance, the Scientific Revolution and the Reformation.


Over the course of an hour, 10- and 11-year-olds broke into groups to discuss why Leonardo da Vinci was interested in human anatomy. They wrote about how the ideas of Copernicus and Galileo differed from those of the ancient Greeks.

Students used books, pencils and highlighters, not computers or tablets.


"One positive development of the past decade has been a shift toward a research-backed focus on structured phonics in the early grades — to successful effect," writes Goldstein. Now attention is shifting toward research showing that good readers "need a strong vocabulary and knowledge about the world" in order to understand what they decode.


In the quest to boost reading scores in the accountability era, schools often minimized time for social studies and science, the courses that boost vocabulary, knowledge and reading comprehension, Barbara Davidson of the Knowledge Matters Campaign tells Goldstein. That pendulum is swinging back.


Education reformers need to focus more on what happens in the classroom, less on policy, argues Robert Pondiscio. "Help teachers teach better" by giving them high-quality training, high-quality curricula and streamlined, doable-by-a-human-being workloads.

10 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Bruce Smith
Bruce Smith
May 14
Rated 4 out of 5 stars.

Robert (a Facebook friend of mine for about 15 years) usually offers good advice, as he does here, though what is presented here lacks specifics: good policy happens in the classroom through decentralization of curricula, to be outlined by local educational agency, and specified by school; the decentralization of collective labour agreements, normally to be agreed between municipal employers and teachers' unions, with individual contracts to be negotiated between directors and teachers; and the decentralization of teacher training, with universities of teacher education competing to supply local schools with the best trained teachers for schools to employ.

Edited
Like
Bruce Smith
Bruce Smith
May 20
Replying to

All three of those descriptors you give apply to California's school districts and other special-purpose districts -- none of them mark a district as "independent"; while New York City's mayoral government of schools, under a strong mayor like Bloomberg, can help to limit costs, and raise the competitiveness and attractiveness of a municipality, which most of California's cities are struggling with because of coastal California's dysfunctional school districts.

Like

Malcolm Kirkpatrick
Malcolm Kirkpatrick
May 13

School choice plus official indifference looks good to me. We've had enough of the planned economy. The $837 billion per year (2020-2021 total) US K-12 credential industry is the second-largest (after China) command economy left on Earth. State (i.e., government, generally) control of school in the US has done to education in the US what collectivization of agriculture did to nutrition in Kazakhstan (1929-1933), Ukraine (1932-1833), China (1958-1962), Cambodia (1975-1979), and Ethiopia (1984-1985).

Like

superdestroyer
May 13

Politicians have been trying to close the achievement gap and improvement academic learning for decades. Every attempt has failed from spending more or spending less or higher standards or no standards.


In the end, academic ability falls along a log-normal curve but politicians cannot make policy based upon real data and the public refuse to face the idea that everyone cannot learn calculus.


In reality, in 2025, the entire political spectrum is operating on the basis that the easiest solution will be to stop generating data that can be used to show how badly students are performing from school choice to no testing.

Edited
Like
bottom of page