A black mother's choice for her son: It will be private school


I'm sending my black son to private school, writes Jenisha Watts in The Atlantic. Growing up in Lexington, Kentucky, she "received an abysmal education" at the sort of mostly black, low-income public school that failed Nikole Hannah-Jones' daughter. She worked hard to catch up, but is still coping with her educational deficits. She will not put her son at risk.
What's interesting is that Watts considers Hannah-Jones a friend and confidant. She admires her courage. "I’ve always believed that I have a responsibility, especially as a Black woman who comes from a difficult background, to care about all kids in need," she writes. "I fear I am betraying that when I choose what is best for my son and my son alone."
But he's going to private school.
Watts knows "many strong, successful Black women who rose out of difficult backgrounds and eventually got the education they were denied as children," she writes, but that's much rarer for black men. "I watched my brother get himself together and go to college, before going back to the streets."
Watts worried when her son's preschool began admitted more black and brown students who qualified for government aid to pay tuition. Would more kids from troubled homes be in her son's class? "I had been a kid like that," she writes. Her crack-addicted "mother was the one other parents judged at drop-off. And now I wanted my son as far away from the little Jenishas as possible."
She's angry about schools that fail their students, Watts writes. But she doesn't just want a school with high expectations and competent teachers. She wants well-behaved, ready-to-learn classmates from stable families.



Single largest obstacle to good public schools is the capture of public education by the Democrat party and teacher's unions for political purposes. Any education that occurs in public schools under democrats is purely incidental and accidental.
Somewhere along the line, teachers picked up the Romantic idea that they're really there for the kids who need them most: the most deprived, underprivileged, traumatized children. The kids who are homeless, abused, impoverished, starving for education.
This is great as far as it goes; but if it means the children from stable, secure homes are 'less important' to the teacher, that's a problem for those children (and their parents). If the teacher can say, "Oh, these ones will be fine no matter what," and proceed to neglect them--let them read on their own, while focusing time and attention on the needier ones--then eventually you start to wonder, Why am I sending my child to school at all? Why don…