top of page
  • Writer's pictureJoanne Jacobs

Virtual tutoring won't work if students don't use it

On-demand virtual tutoring has the potential to help students catch up in school, concludes a recent study of California students in Aspire charter schools. But most students don't benefit because they don't use it.


Furthermore, the weakest students were the least likely to try it, notes Hechinger's Jill Barshay. "Among the students who needed tutoring the most because they had failed a class with a D or an F in the fall of 2020, only 12 percent ever logged on. Students who were doing well at school and not at risk of failure were twice as likely to take advantage of the free tutoring."


"Schools are required to spend 20 percent of their $122 billion in federal pandemic recovery funds on helping students catch up academically," writes Barshay. There is "strong scientific evidence of academic gains" from tutoring three or four times a week, known as “high dosage.”

“Good tutoring also means working with the same tutor over time and building a relationship, which isn’t usually possible with an on-demand sort of support,” said Amanda Neitzel, assistant professor at the Center for Research and Reform in Education at Johns Hopkins University and research director for ProvenTutoring, a coalition of organizations that provide evidence-based tutoring programs.
Neitzel advises schools not to spend their pandemic recovery money on 24/7 online tutoring. “I think in most cases, no,” she said. “There is very little evidence to support this, and plenty of better alternatives.”

Schools across the country are having trouble recruiting, training and scheduling in-person tutors, so they're trying virtual services such as Paper.


Paper’s CEO Philip Cutler told Barshay his company's on-demand tutoring is better because it can serve many more students.

At first glance, on-demand online tutoring would seem to be more economical. Cutler said his company charges a flat fee of $40 to $80 per student, depending on the size of the school district, regardless of hours used or how many students log in. By contrast, evidence-based high-dosage tutoring can run $4,000 per student for the year. However, given the low usage seen in the California study, per-hour costs can be similar.
. . . Terry Grier, the former schools superintendent of Houston and a mentor to school leaders around the country, said schools that want to offer on-demand tutoring should negotiate tighter deals and pay only for the hours used and only if student test scores increase. . . . In his own experience with “high-dosage” tutoring in Texas, he said that the in-person, intensive version was very effective, especially in math. He said he also tried online tutoring, but it didn’t work well. “Kids wouldn’t use it,” Grier said.

The flexibility of on-demand tutoring is a strength and a weakness, write researchers Susanna Loeb and Carly D. Robinson. Aspire students could get help from well-trained tutors in any subject at any time. "Accessing the opt-in tutoring increased the likelihood of students passing all of their courses." But the students who needed help the most didn't try.

104 views5 comments

5 Comments


Guest
Nov 10, 2022

School "worked" because of Monkey See, Monkey Do. It worked because the desire to belong and to fit into a group doing what the group does, is one of the oldest parts of our nervous system.


In a sense, it was all an illusion. Why do you sit when the teacher says sit? Because the others are sitting. Why do you raise your hand? Because others do. Why do you show up? Because this is your tribe and this is where the tribe meets.


And then adults destroyed all that, and brought to the tribe young students and their teachers the same kind of worthless social customs and habits common in a dysfunctional society.


There is no longer any expectation…


Like

Guest
Nov 09, 2022

I volunteered as a math tutor at a low-performing high school here in Austin. I was a volunteer, so the services were free to both school and student. I did different shifts: during lunch periods and after school. The teachers were given notice to prep students to use tutoring when it became available the next week.


I showed up 10 times over about four or five weeks. During that time I had two students show up for tutoring. One was a very sharp student who just didn't get one thing and I had them up to speed in about 20 minutes. The other student had somehow got the idea that I was there to do their homework for them.


I…


Like

Guest
Nov 09, 2022

"Furthermore, the weakest students were the least likely to try it, notes Hechinger's Jill Barshay. 'Among the students who needed tutoring the most because they had failed a class with a D or an F in the fall of 2020, only 12 percent ever logged on. Students who were doing well at school and not at risk of failure were twice as likely to take advantage of the free tutoring.'"


This is how office hours work, too, right? The kids who need help the most are the one's least likely to show up. The ones who are doing well (and maybe are more engaged) are more likely to show up. I expect that face-to-face tutoring centers on campus sho…

Like
Guest
Nov 10, 2022
Replying to

"In the California study, lead researcher Robinson noticed that online tutors could relieve teachers from having to answer every small question that students have so that they can spend time with students who need more help"


This is poverty thinking. The 2s, 3s and 4s are ignored in class, while the 1s receive massive ineffective staff time in class, in intervention, in study hall, in summer school, in double period, etc. No effort to move 2s and 3s to join the 4s. The public is against poverty thinking as the public knows the district is not that starved of funding that it must turn to babysitting for the majority.

Like
bottom of page