top of page
  • Writer's pictureJoanne Jacobs

Rosalinda wants to be an astronaut, but she doesn't read very well

Massachusetts, which claims to have the best public schools in the nation, is "failing its neediest learners," write Mandy McLaren and Naomi Martin in the Boston Globe. "Before the pandemic, only about half of public school third-graders had adequate reading skills." Now it's even worse.


"Scores for all third-graders have slipped below the 50 percent mark, and the most vulnerable kids are in serious trouble; 75 percent of low-income third-graders could not pass the reading comprehension test on last spring’s MCAS exam," they write. That includes "70 percent of Black third-graders, 80 percent of Latino students, and 85 percent of children with disabilities."


Rosalinda, a fifth-grader in Lowell, wants to be an astronaut when she grows up, but she reads well below grade level. Teachers told her mother, Maritza Alvarado, who works as a chef, not to worry because Rosalinda doesn’t have a learning disability. But she's not catching up. Most children who don't master reading by third grade will continue to struggle.

“. . . how the hell did this child get to the 10th grade and they can’t read?”-- Cambridge high school teacher Lily Rayman-Read

In 2010, Harvard published a report that warned of a “cycle of academic failure” if Massachusetts did not get better at teaching kids to read, write McLaren and Martin. A panel named to study the issue issued five reports in 2019. The recommendations were not followed. "Teachers unions oppose state mandates on curriculum choices."

Massachusetts, the "birthplace of public education," lets schools do their own thing. Some schools "use instructional methods grounded in the science of how children learn to read, an approach which teaches kids to sound out words phonetically rather than guess, and helps them build a store of knowledge about the world early on, instead of skipping from topic to topic." But nearly half use less-effective "balanced literacy" methods and low-quality curriculum.


"Poor children learning to read are now slightly better off going to school in Florida or Mississippi — states that got serious about early literacy years ago — than they are in Massachusetts," they write.

Nine-year-old Isaac Osorio wants to read bigger books, books with longer sentences and harder words. But he’s stuck, unable to move on from beginner texts, whose pictures and predictable word patterns help signal what the jumbles of letters he sees on the page say.
“Winter is here,” he read one recent evening, opening a picture book to a page he’d memorized. “Sleep, bear, sleep. Winter is here. Sleep, snake, sleep.”

As a "balanced literacy" teacher, Marci Amorim adorned her classroom walls "with colorful posters of Skippy the Frog, who encouraged young readers to skip words they didn’t know, and Eagle Eye, who nudged kids to make a guess based on the pictures they saw," McLaren and Martin write. When students didn't learn, the Randolph teacher assumed it was their fault. “We’d say, ‘Poor little Timmy is just low [in reading]. We’ve tried all these things, but he’s just not reading. He’s just always going to be low and struggling.’ And no. We just weren’t teaching little Timmy how he needed to be taught.”


The story is the first in a series on the literacy crisis.

1,592 views7 comments

Recent Posts

See All

7 Comments


Guest
Oct 11, 2023

This says it all--9 years from a Harvard report to a study panel issuing 5 reports. The bureaucratic inertia of the status quo. Those third graders not learning to read have now finished their secondary schooling.


-->"In 2010, Harvard published a report that warned of a “cycle of academic failure” if Massachusetts did not get better at teaching kids to read, write McLaren and Martin. A panel named to study the issue issued five reports in 2019."

Like

Linda Fox
Linda Fox
Oct 11, 2023

Notice that ONE of the strategies they DON’T suggest trying is sounding the words out?

Which worked for me and just about everyone who tried it. I worked in an adult literacy program, as part of a college class. I was floored to see how many people had NO idea that the letters had sounds attached to them. I discovered it when we got to D in the lessons, and I asked what sound D made?

Not a clue. This wasn’t a dumb woman, just one who had never been taught that in a disciplined, organized, focused phonics approach to reading.

So much for ‘incidental phonics’. That’s a scattershot approach.

The thing is, that all could be taught in Head…

Like

Guest
Oct 10, 2023

Like that will stop her from being an astronaut. DEI ensures that we will live in the world described by Harrison Bergeron.

Like

Guest
Oct 09, 2023

Too bad Rosalinda can't sue the school districts who promoted her even though she couldn't read. Educational child abuse should be a thing.


As always:


"Carthago delenda est" To modernize Cato: The public school system must be destroyed (Ratio scholae publicae delenda est).


It's past the point where it can be "evolved" or "transformed" into something sane. It has to be abandoned and rebuilt from the ground up.

Like
Guest
Oct 10, 2023
Replying to

"she reads well below grade level"....no mention of the progress made since preK began or the ELL status or vocab status. My district has plenty who are willing, able, but need a lot of vocab building. The district only offers vocab building to classified students...everyone else is on their own...and with no dictionaries supplied in the classrooms, no spelling program, and no small group instruction for unclassified, its slow going.

Like
bottom of page