It’s a smart world after all

Journalist Amanda Ripley’s “riveting” new book, The Smartest Kids in the World, shows why U.S. students don’t perform as well as many European and Asian students, writes Dana Goldstein in The Daily Beast. It’s the culture, stupid.

According to the OECD, 20 countries have higher high school graduation rates than the United States. Among developed nations, our children rank 17th in reading and 31st in math. Even Poland, with high child poverty rates similar to our own, boasts stronger student achievement and faster system-wide improvement.

Ripley follows three American teenagers studying abroad in Finland, South Korea, and Poland. They discover “high schools that are deeply, even shockingly, enamored of intellectualism,” writes Goldstein.

In the U.S., most teachers earned about average grades and test scores when they were in high school and college. But in Finland, it is as competitive to become a public school teacher as it is to gain acceptance into an Ivy League university. There are no shortcuts into the classroom—prospective teachers must earn a master’s degree, write a research-driven thesis, and spend a full year in a teaching residency, observing master educators at work and practicing lessons and classroom management.

While few of us would want to subject our children to South Korea’s insane levels of testing stress, that nation at least shows kids that academic achievement is valued. On the morning of the national college entrance exam, the stock market opens an hour late, to clear the roads for 600,000 nervous students. Younger kids line up outside schools to cheer as their peers enter to take the nine-hour test. The scene, Ripley observes, is “like boxers entering a ring for a fight.”

In all three nations, schools don’t sponsor sports teams, Ripley writes. Kids who want to play a sport organize their own games, join a community program or hire a coach. Schools are for academics.

Children who can’t meet high expectations are allowed to fail.

Ripley believes that compared with their counterparts abroad, too many American educators rely on poverty as an excuse for poor student achievement. . . .

A  Finnish teacher tells Ripley that he doesn’t feel empathy for his immigrant students, “because I have to teach. If I thought about all of this too much, I would give better marks to them for worse work. I’d think, ‘Oh you poor kid. Oh, well, what can I do?’ That would make my job too easy.”

Compassion is “what really matters in education,” writes Carol Lach, who just retired from the Massachusetts Department of Education, in Ed Week.  She quotes a junior high student she taught 40 years ago:  “Why should I care about your math if you don’t care about me?”

About Joanne


  1. Richard Aubrey says:

    Ref the last.
    I suppose it’s a jr hi thing to say, but it’s dumb. Probably predictable.
    It presumes the kid is supposed to learn math to make his teacher happy because …something something.
    Kid doesn’t know he’s supposed to learn math for his own sake. Who misled him?

  2. Crimson Wife says:

    Wouldn’t caring about a student entail wanting him/her to master the skills that will allow him/her to have a shot at a decent future? Sometimes things that are unpleasant in the short run are beneficial to us in the long run, even if kids lack the maturity to recognize this.

  3. “Children who can’t meet high expectations are allowed to fail. ”

    In our system, we only fail those who fail to meet the absolute minimum expectations.

    • Thinly Veiled Anonymity says:

      It’s worse than that.

      We only *fail* those who meet the absolute minimum expectations. But we “pass” thousands more who really haven’t, and allow them to go out and fail at life instead.

  4. [blockquote] But in Finland, it is as competitive to become a public school teacher as it is to gain acceptance into an Ivy League university.[/blockquote]

    There’s a great deal of competition for teaching jobs here in the U.S. The problem is that the basis of the competition isn’t teaching skill.

  5. Don’t worry, give each of those nation a few generations of American levels of wealth and watch.

    Once parents realize that they can restructure culture to protect their children from failure (or harm), they *will* do so. Real, meaningful standards means real, meaningful failures for some. So they must go.

    (Previously, each society was close enough to the edge that it couldn’t afford the expense of protecting their vulnerable children – obviously, now they can, and thus they will.)

  6. Ted Craig says:

    “In all three nations, schools don’t sponsor sports teams, Ripley writes.”
    Really? So this is just some more of that Wikipedia misinformation?
    “Whimoon High School students ranked #1 many times to be offered to enter SNU (Seoul National University). Over 100 students get an offer from top three universities including SNU, KU (Korea University) and YU (Yonsei University). Whimoon High School is also famous for its excellent sports team, especially basketball team and baseball team. In 2010, Whimoon Baseball team became the champion of the national highschool baseball league sponsored by the president of Republic of Korea. It was the 5th champion title.”