Seeking the “college experience,” young women in “party dorms” — especially those from working-class families — are distracted from their academic goals by social pressures, according to Paying for the Party: How College Maintains Inequality. Elizabeth-A.-Armstrong, a University of Michigan sociology professor, and Laura T. Hamilton, of the University of California at Merced, followed 53 women for five years after they first moved into a dorm at a middle-tier public university.
Even ambitious students were tempted by the “party pathway,” which included a Greek party scene and an array of easy majors, researchers found.
. . . Taylor and Emma had strong academic records entering college and both aspired to be dentists. At the end of the study, Taylor was in dental school while Emma was working as a dental assistant—a job that does not require a college degree. Their fates diverged when Emma made it into an elite sorority and Taylor opted into a more studious sorority—a move supported by her college-savvy parents. Without highly educated parents like Taylor’s, Emma needed academic and social supports not offered at this school to succeed.
“College did not act as a pathway to upward mobility for most,” Armstrong said.
“Party schools” cater to “the social and educational needs of affluent, full-freight students,” write Hamilton and Armstrong. For students who can’t afford five or six years to earn a soft degree — or no degree at all — the “college experience” is too costly.