Teachers take over schools

Across the country, teachers are taking over schools, reports the New York Times.  In Newark, a group of  Teach for America veterans are running a public K-8 school, Brick Avon Academy, as teacher-leaders. The “principal teacher,” Charity Haygood, teaches every day, as do two vice principals.

While they are in charge of disciplining and evaluating staff members, they plan to defer all decisions about curriculum, policies, hiring and the budget to a governance committee made up largely of teachers elected by colleagues.

. . . Teachers have more say over what they teach, and starting next year they will have more time to work with children when they introduce a longer day.

Founders were given a low-scoring school in a low-income, high-crime neighborhood.  They plan to turn Brick Avon into an International Baccalaureate school and to require Mandarin as well as Spanish.

Los Angeles has turned over 29 city schools to teacher-led groups, who beat out established charter operators. Detroit is opening a teacher-run elementary school. Boston Teachers Union opened a teacher-run school last year “with teachers ordering supplies, giving feedback to one another and deciding whose hours to reduce to save money.”

Until recently, most teacher-led schools have been charters.  It’s harder to change the administrative structure in a district-run school.

Tim McDonald, an associate with Education Evolving, a policy group in St. Paul that supports teacher-led schools, said studies showed that when teachers were given control — much like doctors or lawyers running their own practices — schools had higher morale, less turnover, more efficient decision-making and greater motivation to improve.

Still, Mr. McDonald was skeptical that a truly collaborative model could succeed widely in school districts, unless it was somehow freed from the traditional bureaucracy.

“The question is whether teachers have the patience to do the ‘adminis-trivia,’ ” said James Lytle, a former principal and superintendent and now an education professor at University of Pennsylvania.

The union-run UFT Charter School in East New York, Brooklyn, has run into problems. Two principals resigned after clashing with teachers, and recent test scores have been disappointing; only 22 percent of last year’s eighth graders passed state tests in English and 13 percent in math, compared with citywide rates of 37.5 percent in English and 46.3 percent in math.

Teachers are running schools in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Denver, reports Public School Review.  Some are charters and some are district-run but nearly all enroll primarily low-income, minority students.  Results are mixed for the Minnesota and Wisconsin schools, writes Beth Hawkins in Education Next.

About Joanne


  1. Another “pretend trend” from the Times.

  2. the problem w/ UFT Charter School (both sites)

    1) FIRED a lot of Good Teachers this past June.
    2) Many of the Admin/Staff members are related to each other… so they are always looking out for them.
    3) i’m sorry to say it, but they are racist…. FIRED all the good teachers who happens to be cauasian and kept all the bad teachers who just so happen to be african americans.
    4) the ADMIN doesnt care about the kids, but only themselve.
    5) The school was always about Teacher’s Voice – after Michelle Bodden became the leader of that school, it NO LONGER EXIST.
    6) Many of the teachers went to the UFT Board meeting to let them know what was happening to the school – they didnt want to hear it.

    … oh so many more story to tell.

  3. I had to laugh: “a group of Teach for America veterans”. What, they had three years of experience as teachers?


  1. […] How are teachers taking over schools? And what does it mean for students? (Linking and thinking on education) […]