<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discipline quotas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/11/discipline-quotas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/11/discipline-quotas/</link>
	<description>Free-linking and thinking on education by Joanne Jacobs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:11:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Margo/Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/11/discipline-quotas/comment-page-1/#comment-102498</link>
		<dc:creator>Margo/Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joannejacobs.com/?p=12004#comment-102498</guid>
		<description>&quot;But permitting disruptive behavior doesn’t help the child.&quot;

And is there something in anything that I have said that leads you to believe that I advocate permitting disruptive behavior? This is what makes me crazy in these discussions. There are two options--kick the kid out or allow disruptive behavior. That is just silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But permitting disruptive behavior doesn’t help the child.&#8221;</p>
<p>And is there something in anything that I have said that leads you to believe that I advocate permitting disruptive behavior? This is what makes me crazy in these discussions. There are two options&#8211;kick the kid out or allow disruptive behavior. That is just silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/11/discipline-quotas/comment-page-1/#comment-102495</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joannejacobs.com/?p=12004#comment-102495</guid>
		<description>This thread is getting pretty far afield, but Margo, you&#039;ve pointed out something that both supports and also undercuts your case.  I agree that many low-income, minority youth do have a home culture that teaches respect (I live in a neighborhood like yours).  But, too often the respect gets left behind when the kids go out the door.  And for some, it REALLY gets left behind when the child walks into the school.  Part of this is no doubt due to the discomfort/pain of being in a historically marginalized group, the desire to dominate in a setting where acting out can achieve that goal, and other understandable reasons.  Definitely one of those is that dynamic of high school students who&#039;ve received weak instruction, then been socially promoted feeling out of their depth.  But permitting disruptive behavior doesn&#039;t help the child.  Most kids will tell you that they don&#039;t respect you when you allow them to get away with bad behavior.  The fact that children have been taught respect at home is a good thing, but it needs to be reflected in classroom behavior and too often it isn&#039;t.  And I include self-respect and respect for peers in this paradigm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This thread is getting pretty far afield, but Margo, you&#8217;ve pointed out something that both supports and also undercuts your case.  I agree that many low-income, minority youth do have a home culture that teaches respect (I live in a neighborhood like yours).  But, too often the respect gets left behind when the kids go out the door.  And for some, it REALLY gets left behind when the child walks into the school.  Part of this is no doubt due to the discomfort/pain of being in a historically marginalized group, the desire to dominate in a setting where acting out can achieve that goal, and other understandable reasons.  Definitely one of those is that dynamic of high school students who&#8217;ve received weak instruction, then been socially promoted feeling out of their depth.  But permitting disruptive behavior doesn&#8217;t help the child.  Most kids will tell you that they don&#8217;t respect you when you allow them to get away with bad behavior.  The fact that children have been taught respect at home is a good thing, but it needs to be reflected in classroom behavior and too often it isn&#8217;t.  And I include self-respect and respect for peers in this paradigm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Aubrey</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/11/discipline-quotas/comment-page-1/#comment-102493</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Aubrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joannejacobs.com/?p=12004#comment-102493</guid>
		<description>Margo.
Whether there is a discrepancy in penalties for behaviors is a difficult question. It allows for advocates to make equivalences between different behaviors and, presto, different penalties for similar behaviors.
I have dealt with activists long enough to NOT TRUST them in any, least, littlest, tiniest way.  NONE.
So until the possibility/certainty that the studies are making equivalences between different behaviors is solved to my satisfaction, I don&#039;t intend to worry about the findings.
In the Detroit area, there were various folks interviewed in the papers, activists, parents, and so forth, who thought the black kids should be given more scope because certain words were so common in their environment that calling a teacher one of them didn&#039;t actually mean anything.  And because their home and neighborhood circumstances were so bleak, a certain amount of violence had to be expected.
I don&#039;t follow the Detroit papers much any longer, and this was about ten years ago, so I don&#039;t know if anybody&#039;s still pitching this.  However, with that as part of the background, the idea that we know for certain that the behaviors receiving different penalties are actually equivalent is suspect.  Who says they&#039;re equivalent?  Let&#039;s have details.  We know, for example, that the NCVS brings us different numbers than we get from, for example, the FBI, and different numbers than we get from various advocacy groups.  All but the first are filtered through the criminal justice system, which makes them subject to arbitrary classification.
The fact remains, see NCVS, that blacks commit more violent crimes per capita than other ethnic groups. To presume this is not the case in school would be fatuous.
Until it can be proven not to be the case in school, a fair penalty system is going to have racially disproportionate penalty outcomes.

BTW. Somebody left a Detroit paper in the break room this morning.  Long article on how crime rules the streets in Detroit and how law enforcement is becoming less and less effective.  Hard to think of a public school being completely invulnerable to the myriad influences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Margo.<br />
Whether there is a discrepancy in penalties for behaviors is a difficult question. It allows for advocates to make equivalences between different behaviors and, presto, different penalties for similar behaviors.<br />
I have dealt with activists long enough to NOT TRUST them in any, least, littlest, tiniest way.  NONE.<br />
So until the possibility/certainty that the studies are making equivalences between different behaviors is solved to my satisfaction, I don&#8217;t intend to worry about the findings.<br />
In the Detroit area, there were various folks interviewed in the papers, activists, parents, and so forth, who thought the black kids should be given more scope because certain words were so common in their environment that calling a teacher one of them didn&#8217;t actually mean anything.  And because their home and neighborhood circumstances were so bleak, a certain amount of violence had to be expected.<br />
I don&#8217;t follow the Detroit papers much any longer, and this was about ten years ago, so I don&#8217;t know if anybody&#8217;s still pitching this.  However, with that as part of the background, the idea that we know for certain that the behaviors receiving different penalties are actually equivalent is suspect.  Who says they&#8217;re equivalent?  Let&#8217;s have details.  We know, for example, that the NCVS brings us different numbers than we get from, for example, the FBI, and different numbers than we get from various advocacy groups.  All but the first are filtered through the criminal justice system, which makes them subject to arbitrary classification.<br />
The fact remains, see NCVS, that blacks commit more violent crimes per capita than other ethnic groups. To presume this is not the case in school would be fatuous.<br />
Until it can be proven not to be the case in school, a fair penalty system is going to have racially disproportionate penalty outcomes.</p>
<p>BTW. Somebody left a Detroit paper in the break room this morning.  Long article on how crime rules the streets in Detroit and how law enforcement is becoming less and less effective.  Hard to think of a public school being completely invulnerable to the myriad influences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margo/Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/11/discipline-quotas/comment-page-1/#comment-102487</link>
		<dc:creator>Margo/Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joannejacobs.com/?p=12004#comment-102487</guid>
		<description>Anon--I live in &quot;the hood.&quot; My choice, I have a great old house and have had some terrific neighbors. I am on the fringe of a &quot;changing&quot; neighborhood, meaning that folks are buying up beautiful old mansions that were turned into boarding houses when demographics shifted to the suburbs and restoring them.

Some parts of my neighborhood really DO Hallowe&#039;en--decorations, costumes, all that. My block not so much--but I do like sitting out front with my bucket of goodies. This year the first callers approached down the block at dusk. I heard them coming. Their language was foul, they were large and I wasn&#039;t expecting them to be trick or treaters. When they were almost to the house, one of them whipped a mask out of his bookbag and put it on. I said something to them, along the lines of, &quot;oh, you are trick or treating--you better watch your language.&quot; I also reminded them that there were lots of little kids and and they needed to watch how they talk. They left with their candy, saying &quot;yes, ma&#039;am.&quot; Point is--they had good home training. Most of the low-income, minority kids in my neighborhood have learned at home a formality and respect for elders that exceeds that of my own home culture--or many more middle class kids. On my street, I am ALWAYS referred to as Ms. Margo. Because kids get in trouble for calling adults by their first name. Personally I am a first name person--and in most settings where I worked with kids this has been appropriate. But I have learned consistency with home culture in providing and accepting the Ms. 

This doesn&#039;t mean every parent is stellar--as I can also guarantee is the case in more middle class neighborhoods. But the fact that so few people see the home training and culture that is there is a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon&#8211;I live in &#8220;the hood.&#8221; My choice, I have a great old house and have had some terrific neighbors. I am on the fringe of a &#8220;changing&#8221; neighborhood, meaning that folks are buying up beautiful old mansions that were turned into boarding houses when demographics shifted to the suburbs and restoring them.</p>
<p>Some parts of my neighborhood really DO Hallowe&#8217;en&#8211;decorations, costumes, all that. My block not so much&#8211;but I do like sitting out front with my bucket of goodies. This year the first callers approached down the block at dusk. I heard them coming. Their language was foul, they were large and I wasn&#8217;t expecting them to be trick or treaters. When they were almost to the house, one of them whipped a mask out of his bookbag and put it on. I said something to them, along the lines of, &#8220;oh, you are trick or treating&#8211;you better watch your language.&#8221; I also reminded them that there were lots of little kids and and they needed to watch how they talk. They left with their candy, saying &#8220;yes, ma&#8217;am.&#8221; Point is&#8211;they had good home training. Most of the low-income, minority kids in my neighborhood have learned at home a formality and respect for elders that exceeds that of my own home culture&#8211;or many more middle class kids. On my street, I am ALWAYS referred to as Ms. Margo. Because kids get in trouble for calling adults by their first name. Personally I am a first name person&#8211;and in most settings where I worked with kids this has been appropriate. But I have learned consistency with home culture in providing and accepting the Ms. </p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t mean every parent is stellar&#8211;as I can also guarantee is the case in more middle class neighborhoods. But the fact that so few people see the home training and culture that is there is a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lightly Seasoned</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/11/discipline-quotas/comment-page-1/#comment-102462</link>
		<dc:creator>Lightly Seasoned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joannejacobs.com/?p=12004#comment-102462</guid>
		<description>Oh, I&#039;m all for having kids arrive with social skills, believe me.  It is an additional burden on our limited instructional time when I have to explain to a student how to behave.  It also shifts a great deal of discipline from the office to the teacher (with the hope, I guess, that it just gets reduced so it ceases to be a burden to anyone... still...).

I gather ours is one of only a few high school buildings doing PBS.  I&#039;m not on that particular committee, but we do have people in observing us all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I&#8217;m all for having kids arrive with social skills, believe me.  It is an additional burden on our limited instructional time when I have to explain to a student how to behave.  It also shifts a great deal of discipline from the office to the teacher (with the hope, I guess, that it just gets reduced so it ceases to be a burden to anyone&#8230; still&#8230;).</p>
<p>I gather ours is one of only a few high school buildings doing PBS.  I&#8217;m not on that particular committee, but we do have people in observing us all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/11/discipline-quotas/comment-page-1/#comment-102460</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joannejacobs.com/?p=12004#comment-102460</guid>
		<description>Oops -- just updated my knowledge of PBS, especially the schoolwide kind.  My apologies for ignorantly asserting that it would be intrusive -- it&#039;s clearly not.  Time consuming, maybe, but not intrusive.  Yet, the fact that it seems to be effective for schools and school systems like yours, Lightly Seasoned, doesn&#039;t diminish the reality that it&#039;s always good to at least hope that students will arrive at school with little need for this kind of overt teaching/coaching/monitoring of their behavior.  Guess I&#039;d better go and observe in a school that uses PBS, to get over my feeling that (at least at the high school level), it amounts to keeping the training wheels on for too long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops &#8212; just updated my knowledge of PBS, especially the schoolwide kind.  My apologies for ignorantly asserting that it would be intrusive &#8212; it&#8217;s clearly not.  Time consuming, maybe, but not intrusive.  Yet, the fact that it seems to be effective for schools and school systems like yours, Lightly Seasoned, doesn&#8217;t diminish the reality that it&#8217;s always good to at least hope that students will arrive at school with little need for this kind of overt teaching/coaching/monitoring of their behavior.  Guess I&#8217;d better go and observe in a school that uses PBS, to get over my feeling that (at least at the high school level), it amounts to keeping the training wheels on for too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lightly Seasoned</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/11/discipline-quotas/comment-page-1/#comment-102455</link>
		<dc:creator>Lightly Seasoned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joannejacobs.com/?p=12004#comment-102455</guid>
		<description>Fascinating.  We do PBS district-wide.  It isn&#039;t intrusive into students&#039; lives in any significant way that, say, a detention or conference with the principal wouldn&#039;t be.

While there&#039;s some overlap with IEP students (mostly those with ED), it isn&#039;t about them at all.

Not a cure-all, but has been pretty effective in cutting hall misbehavior, fights, tardies, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating.  We do PBS district-wide.  It isn&#8217;t intrusive into students&#8217; lives in any significant way that, say, a detention or conference with the principal wouldn&#8217;t be.</p>
<p>While there&#8217;s some overlap with IEP students (mostly those with ED), it isn&#8217;t about them at all.</p>
<p>Not a cure-all, but has been pretty effective in cutting hall misbehavior, fights, tardies, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/11/discipline-quotas/comment-page-1/#comment-102454</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joannejacobs.com/?p=12004#comment-102454</guid>
		<description>No, it is not a misunderstanding of PBS.  One thread of opinion holds that PBS can/should be implemented as a school-wide behavior management system, but the research to indicate that this is a feasible way to operate schools, or a desirable way to help children mature into good adult behavior, is lacking.  At present, it is a theory with limited implementation.  We haven&#039;t, in this country (or any other) decided as a community that we want to hold schools responsible for molding students&#039; behavior in this fairly global way.

That&#039;s not to say, Margo, that schools can&#039;t have an impact on student behavior;  they clearly can, and they should be expected to have rational and consistent ways of guiding students either to encourage mature behavior or to remediate unacceptable behavior.  But PBS, for most, would represent undue intrusion on the lives of students when a better alternative is for them to get the guidance they need at home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it is not a misunderstanding of PBS.  One thread of opinion holds that PBS can/should be implemented as a school-wide behavior management system, but the research to indicate that this is a feasible way to operate schools, or a desirable way to help children mature into good adult behavior, is lacking.  At present, it is a theory with limited implementation.  We haven&#8217;t, in this country (or any other) decided as a community that we want to hold schools responsible for molding students&#8217; behavior in this fairly global way.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say, Margo, that schools can&#8217;t have an impact on student behavior;  they clearly can, and they should be expected to have rational and consistent ways of guiding students either to encourage mature behavior or to remediate unacceptable behavior.  But PBS, for most, would represent undue intrusion on the lives of students when a better alternative is for them to get the guidance they need at home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margo/Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/11/discipline-quotas/comment-page-1/#comment-102453</link>
		<dc:creator>Margo/Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joannejacobs.com/?p=12004#comment-102453</guid>
		<description>&quot;That they will have learned, at levels appropriate to their ages, to be patient when bored, stoical when others pester them, able to be silent when others are talking, and not anxious to be in people’s faces. These are skills that can be taught at home, and need to be taught at home.&quot;

Anon--one year my daughter&#039;s school had a PTA President with a serious type A personality. She set herself a goal of having a parent volunteer in every classroom for every day of the first week of school. I got a phone call, and since I had elected to run my vacation over into the first week of school, I was available to show up in my daughter&#039;s first grade classroom. I got to watch something that I might not have otherwise. During the first part of class, the teacher had a number of bookkeeping tasks to attend to (attendance, lunch counts, etc). So, she started off with some seat work that they were to do, and instructed the class that when finished they were to select a book from the shelf and engage in free reading time silently at their seat. 

The first child finished did so. The next few, however, took a bit longer, started chatting with one another, drifting off, etc. I watched while every instinct in me said to issue a reminder of what was expected--but the teacher missed it. Meanwhile the children were eying the teacher. Her words had given them a clear message, which her behavior was now belying. What did she mean? Should they follow her words, or were they free now to wander the room and have conversation as her behavior was implying. Eventually the classroom was very noisy and children were in places other than their seats or at the book shelf. And the teacher started to yell angrily. The class was out of control and so was she. I am certain that she thought that they were being bad. I would say that they were being misled--not that they didn&#039;t make choices, but that the wrong choices (which tended to be self-reinforcing) were allowed to move forward until there was chaos.

Developing those instincts (knowing when to stop behavior before it derails completely) and expecting such actions to have an impact comes partially from experience, partially from reflection on what works vs what does not, and partially from believing that one&#039;s actions will have an impact. Without this, I have seen well-trained children from the best of families go far astray. With this, I have seen children with minimal &quot;home training&quot; eager to do right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That they will have learned, at levels appropriate to their ages, to be patient when bored, stoical when others pester them, able to be silent when others are talking, and not anxious to be in people’s faces. These are skills that can be taught at home, and need to be taught at home.&#8221;</p>
<p>Anon&#8211;one year my daughter&#8217;s school had a PTA President with a serious type A personality. She set herself a goal of having a parent volunteer in every classroom for every day of the first week of school. I got a phone call, and since I had elected to run my vacation over into the first week of school, I was available to show up in my daughter&#8217;s first grade classroom. I got to watch something that I might not have otherwise. During the first part of class, the teacher had a number of bookkeeping tasks to attend to (attendance, lunch counts, etc). So, she started off with some seat work that they were to do, and instructed the class that when finished they were to select a book from the shelf and engage in free reading time silently at their seat. </p>
<p>The first child finished did so. The next few, however, took a bit longer, started chatting with one another, drifting off, etc. I watched while every instinct in me said to issue a reminder of what was expected&#8211;but the teacher missed it. Meanwhile the children were eying the teacher. Her words had given them a clear message, which her behavior was now belying. What did she mean? Should they follow her words, or were they free now to wander the room and have conversation as her behavior was implying. Eventually the classroom was very noisy and children were in places other than their seats or at the book shelf. And the teacher started to yell angrily. The class was out of control and so was she. I am certain that she thought that they were being bad. I would say that they were being misled&#8211;not that they didn&#8217;t make choices, but that the wrong choices (which tended to be self-reinforcing) were allowed to move forward until there was chaos.</p>
<p>Developing those instincts (knowing when to stop behavior before it derails completely) and expecting such actions to have an impact comes partially from experience, partially from reflection on what works vs what does not, and partially from believing that one&#8217;s actions will have an impact. Without this, I have seen well-trained children from the best of families go far astray. With this, I have seen children with minimal &#8220;home training&#8221; eager to do right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margo/Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/11/discipline-quotas/comment-page-1/#comment-102451</link>
		<dc:creator>Margo/Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joannejacobs.com/?p=12004#comment-102451</guid>
		<description>&quot;But, creating a PBS plan for every misbehaving student is not practical (much though I’m in favor of PBS, it’s really an intervention designed for children with IEP’s, and in particular children with severe emotional, cognitive, or behavioral disabilities).&quot;

This is a serious misunderstanding of PBS. In fact, Sugai points out that in an environment that where PBS is regarded only as special planning for kids with behavioral challenges, those kids are nearly doomed to failure if the rest of the environment is not also addressed. 

Mr. Aubrey--perhaps you would be so kind as to address the proven disparity, along racial lines, of the severity of responses to identical behavior. This is a real issue, whether you want it to be or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But, creating a PBS plan for every misbehaving student is not practical (much though I’m in favor of PBS, it’s really an intervention designed for children with IEP’s, and in particular children with severe emotional, cognitive, or behavioral disabilities).&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a serious misunderstanding of PBS. In fact, Sugai points out that in an environment that where PBS is regarded only as special planning for kids with behavioral challenges, those kids are nearly doomed to failure if the rest of the environment is not also addressed. </p>
<p>Mr. Aubrey&#8211;perhaps you would be so kind as to address the proven disparity, along racial lines, of the severity of responses to identical behavior. This is a real issue, whether you want it to be or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.561 seconds -->
