It ain't necessarily so

Much of what everyone knows about child development isn’t so, write Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman in Nurture Shock: New Thinking About Children. Child development research develops over time, they write, leaving old ideas behind.

Kay Hymowitz summarizes in a Wall Street Journal book review.

And what do they show? That high self-esteem doesn’t improve grades, reduce anti-social behavior, deter alcohol drinking or do much of anything good for kids.  In fact, telling kids how smart they are can be counterproductive.   Many children who are convinced that they are little geniuses tend not to put much effort into their work. Others are troubled by the latent anxiety of adults who feel it necessary to praise them constantly.

Young children gain nothing from lessons that try to teach tolerance and promote diversity, Bronson and Merryman write.   Older students may respond by becoming overly sensitive.

As for trying to increase emotional intelligence, the education fad of the 1990s, it doesn’t seem to promote “pro-social values” either. It turns out that bullies use their considerable EQ to control their peers.

Programs to prevent students from dropping out or using drugs have no effect, the book concludes.

Tests to determine giftedness in young children are unreliable because children change so much in the early years. Baby Einstein videos? A waste of money.

Not much of a shock, as Hymowitz writes, but good to know.

In Science of Kids, Wray Herbert focuses on Nurture Shock‘s essay on kids and lying.

Writing classes should teach writing

Grading papers for a graduate literature course, Professor Stanley Fish “became alarmed at the “inability of my students to write a clear English sentence,” he blogs at the New York Times. Most were instructors in the college’s composition program.  He discovered that only four of 104 composition sections focused on the craft of writing. In the other 100, “students spent much of their time discussing novels, movies, TV shows and essays on a variety of hot-button issues — racism, sexism, immigration, globalization.”

. . . I advised administrators to insist that all courses listed as courses in composition teach grammar and rhetoric and nothing else. This advice was contemptuously dismissed by the composition establishment, and I was accused of being a reactionary who knew nothing about current trends in research.

Fish cites What Will They Learn? by American Council of Trustees and Alumni, which criticizes general education requirements that let students earn math, science or foreign language credit for courses that don’t teach competency in the subject. As for writing, ACTA opposes giving credit for courses that require writing but don’t teach writing.

In order to qualify, a course must be devoted to “grammar, style, clarity, and argument.” The rationale behind these exclusions is compelling: mathematics, the natural sciences, foreign languages and composition are disciplines with a specific content and a repertoire of essential skills. Courses that center on another content and fail to provide concentrated training in those skills are really courses in another subject. You can tell when you are being taught a mathematical function or a scientific procedure or a foreign language or the uses of the subjunctive and when you are being taught something else.

The damage is done long before college, writes Robert Pondiscio on Core Knowledge Blog.

Writing instruction – especially in “writer’s workshops” concerned primarily with student engagement and developing a child’s “voice” – tends to be more concerned with teaching a child to have something to say, rather than developing the ability to say it clearly, cogently, or grammatically.

The first step in good writing is to figure out what you want to say. But it’s not the only step. I worry about the journal fad, which encourages students to practice writing to themselves but doesn’t teach them how to communicate with other people.

Teacher tackles boy in bomb vest

Teacher Kennet Santana, 35, heard two explosions at San Mateo’s Hillside High and saw a 17-year-old boy in a black tactical vest following fleeing students. With “no time for a lot of thinking,” the English Language Development teacher grabbed the boy.

“I put him in a bear hug and then I decided to flip him and put him on the ground,” he said. “That’s when the thinking came in — I thought — ’If I’m wrong, I’ll apologize to his parents later and if I’m right I’m going to hold this kid down.’” At that moment, a teacher came out of a nearby classroom and Santana told her to go get help. “That’s when the principal (Jeff Gilbert) came with another counselor,” he said. “Between the three of us – the principal took an arm, I held onto an arm and (the counselor) took the legs. We restrained the kid until the police came.” When asked if the young man said anything to him, Santana said: “He said he couldn’t breathe — which was too bad for him I guess.”

“All the while that the teachers and principal are confronting this kid, holding him down and tackling him, he’s got eight live pipe bombs attached to his person,” said San Mateo Police Lt. Mike Brunicardi. Police said the suspect, a former student, also had a two-foot sword and a chain saw. More pipe bombs were found at his home.

No one was injured. It could have gone a different way.

'Eduction' appreciation

To show appreciation for teachers, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools’ Career and Technical Education Department handed out coasters for which it had paid $1,500.  “Education” was spelled “eduction.” Otherwise, a great idea.

Via Dave Barry’s blog.

Carnival of Homeschooling

Homeschoolers have style proclaims this week’s Carnival of Homeschooling, which is hosted by Homeschool Bytes.

SAT scores dip, gaps widen

As more students take the SAT, scores dipped for the class of ’09, reports College Board.  Gender, race and income gaps widened. AP reports:

The average SAT score dipped from 502 last year to 501 on the critical reading section of the test. Math scores held steady at 515, and writing fell from 494 to 493.

. . . Forty percent of students in this year’s pool were minorities and more than one-third reported their parents had never attended college. More than a quarter reported English was not their first language at home.

Female students are more likely to take the SAT; males earn slightly higher scores in reading, lower scores in writing and much higher scores in math.

Asian-Americans, the highest scoring group, made significant gains, while whites, blacks and Hispanics declined. The rich got richer:

. . . scores by students reporting their families earned over $200,000 surged 26 points to 1702, an increase that could fuel further criticism the test is too coachable and favors students who can afford expensive test-prep tutoring.

Of course, affluent students might have better teaching and learning opportunities all the way through school. Their parents certainly try hard enough to provide that.

Study: Students learn more online

Online students outperformed those receiving face-to-face instruction, concludes a SRI report for the Department of Education.  The report analyzed some K-12 studies, but primarily looked at college students  and adults in training programs.  It found online students averaged a 59th percentile ranking, while classroom students in the same course ended up in the 50th percentile.

Philip R. Regier, the dean of Arizona State University’s Online and Extended Campus program, predicts more use of social networking technology to create “learning communities” in which students collaborate.

“People are correct when they say online education will take things out the classroom. But they are wrong, I think, when they assume it will make learning an independent, personal activity. Learning has to occur in a community.”

E-books are going to replace huge, pricey printed textbooks, predicts Jim Cullen, who was asked by his school to pick a new U.S. history textbook.  He hopes the new e-books don’t imitate the current mega-textbooks, which have become almost unreadable.

They’re all just so damn busy — open up to a random page, and you’ll see a map here, an illustration there, information in the margins, headers, subheads, captions, tables. . . . Students tell me such features are appealing to them. Having lots of illustrations in particular makes the individual pages, often flowing in two columns of text, seem less dismaying. I get that. But as someone who likes and is serious about reading, I find all this activity distracting and am always surprised at just how hard it is for me to stay focused on those occasions where I decide I’m really going to read the textbook. . . . The problem is even worse when I try to read a traditional textbook in e-book form, since most e-books simply mimetically reproduce the print book without making much effort to present the material in a computer-screen friendly manner. That, I think, has to change.

If I were to write an e-textbook, I think I’d tell a story with minimal illustrations and let students click their way to documents, photos, maps, songs, bios, “day in the life” sidebars, etc.

God save the Queen in India

To Miss with Love by Snuffy, a British teacher, is back with a great story about a teachers’ tour of schools in India. The children sing the Indian national anthem. Then the principal asks the visiting British teachers to sing their national anthem, God Save the Queen.

I grab the arm of the teacher next to me in desperate need of solidarity. She looks straight at me, knowingly. We all know we’re dead. We all know we don’t know the words. We’re going to cook slowly, humiliated in agony, twisting in excruciating embarrassment …

. . . One of the Indian teachers sits at the piano and begins to play. The English national anthem? Of course she knows it. She doesn’t even need the sheet music. She knows the tune by heart.

So we begin. Our voices shake slightly, gathering strength as we continue. A sense of pride starts to build within our group. We look at each other and smile as we sing. Every now and then one of us stumbles slightly on a word, but the others hold strong and the hesitation disappears in a sea of near-pride and nationalism. . . .  as I stand next to my fellow teachers, in front of these foreigners in a foreign land, I start to realise that this is the first and only time I have ever sung the British national anthem.

Americans get quite a bit of exposure to the Star Spangled Banner. The syntax is complex and the high notes are challenging. Could U.S. teachers sing it without fear? I think so.

Snuffy plans to visit New York City — if she can get a visa. The online form asks:

Have you ever been or are you now involved in espionage or sabotage; or in terrorist activities; or genocide; or between 1933 and 1945 were you involved, in any way, in persecutions associated with Nazi Germany or its allies?

Snuffy wonders if spies, saboteurs, terrorists and mass murderers check “yes” on the form.

'Punctuation hero' branded a vandal

To some Britons, Stefan Gatward is a “punctuation hero.” To others, he’s a vandal. From the Daily Mail:


After enduring sloppy punctuation on the street sign outside his home for more than a year, Stefan Gatward could stand it no longer.

The 62-year-old former soldier decided to launch a one-man crusade against ‘dumbed down’ Britain, and picked up a paintbrush to insert a missing apostrophe.

This turned the incorrect St Johns Close into the correct St John’s Close.

A neighbor turned him for “vandalizing” the sign.

Gatward refuses to join the “five items or less” line at the market to protest the failure to say “five items or fewer.”

He . . . was vexed when he saw a major chain store advertising sales with signs saying ‘until stocks last’ rather than ‘while stocks last’.

‘I fought for the preservation of our heritage and our language but some people seem happy to let that go. I’m not,’ he said.

Via J-Walk Blog, which suggests “St” needs a period.

Teachers on ed degree's value

Teachers discuss an education degree’s value (or lack thereof) on the NY Times’ Room for Debate blog. From Mark:

I am a 21-year veteran teacher who took a whole boatload of education courses in furtherance of my BA and MS degrees. They were utterly useless. The only thing that actually prepared me for teaching was student teaching. All of the other courses taught theory, but nothing practical.

Mark has mixed feelings on merit pay.

I am a very successful teacher, and parents and students alike have sought me out over my career. I make the same salary as another teacher who does nothing but shows movies in class all day. I spend my summers revising my work, creating new and interesting facets to the course. I make the same as the teacher who spends the summer not thinking one iota about the next school year.

Merit pay has some merit, it encourages certain behaviors and discourages others. What I am afraid of is that it will be used to reward the wrong people. If a teacher is mediocre, it is because they have been allowed to get away with it, their behavior empowered by administration. There is a great deal of cronyism in the business, and it skews the playing field.

A “frustrated early-childhood education teacher” calls for combining “pedagogy and a strong apprenticeship” program. What she doesn’t want is to sit through time-wasting professional development classes, such as a “five-hour session that culminated in making a caterpillar from an egg carton.”

Update: After qualifying for National Board certification, a veteran teacher was told he lacks enough credits for certification, reports WashPost columnist Jay Mathews. One phone call from Mathews got the bureaucrats to decide the teacher, who’s also a lawyer and Army vet, is qualified to teach.