<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Standards and sausage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/06/standards-and-sausage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/06/standards-and-sausage/</link>
	<description>Thinking and Linking by Joanne Jacobs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:51:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: allen</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/06/standards-and-sausage/#comment-47519</link>
		<dc:creator>allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/?p=9714#comment-47519</guid>
		<description>In a word, no.

Over at Jay Greene&#039;s blog I quoted Mark Twain about the law and sausage:

&lt;i&gt;Those that respect the law and love sausage should watch neither being made&lt;/i&gt;

Since any national standards will emerge from the political process what those standards look like will bear a strong resemblance to those most influential in its creation but even with that unpromising birthright it&#039;ll still be a political compromise which bodes to make the results even less appealing.

That does play into the hands of the defenders of the educational status quo since they&#039;re inherently opposed to any measures of accountability. A terrible, politically-driven standard that measures nothing worthwhile and draws the ire of everyone who does value education could easily poison the idea of standards as far as the public&#039;s concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a word, no.</p>
<p>Over at Jay Greene&#8217;s blog I quoted Mark Twain about the law and sausage:</p>
<p><i>Those that respect the law and love sausage should watch neither being made</i></p>
<p>Since any national standards will emerge from the political process what those standards look like will bear a strong resemblance to those most influential in its creation but even with that unpromising birthright it&#8217;ll still be a political compromise which bodes to make the results even less appealing.</p>
<p>That does play into the hands of the defenders of the educational status quo since they&#8217;re inherently opposed to any measures of accountability. A terrible, politically-driven standard that measures nothing worthwhile and draws the ire of everyone who does value education could easily poison the idea of standards as far as the public&#8217;s concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/06/standards-and-sausage/#comment-47518</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/?p=9714#comment-47518</guid>
		<description>I wonder if it would be possible to do with national standards what teachers in our math department do with &quot;common assessments&quot;--that is, we come up with a set of, say, 15 questions in a chapter taht we all will give to students, and then we individually add whatever else we want to.

In other words, the &quot;common&quot; part is a core, upon which each teacher builds a test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if it would be possible to do with national standards what teachers in our math department do with &#8220;common assessments&#8221;&#8211;that is, we come up with a set of, say, 15 questions in a chapter taht we all will give to students, and then we individually add whatever else we want to.</p>
<p>In other words, the &#8220;common&#8221; part is a core, upon which each teacher builds a test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

