<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For-profit schools gain in Philly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/02/for-profit-schools-gain-in-philly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/02/for-profit-schools-gain-in-philly/</link>
	<description>Thinking and Linking by Joanne Jacobs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:51:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andromeda</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/02/for-profit-schools-gain-in-philly/#comment-43907</link>
		<dc:creator>Andromeda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/?p=7567#comment-43907</guid>
		<description>This feels wrong.  25% of a standard deviation is 60% of a year&#039;s worth of learning?  Shall I conclude that one standard deviation is 2.4 years&#039; worth of learning per year, and conclude thereby that a substantial fraction of students are forgetting more than a year&#039;s worth of material per year?  I mean, I have a cynical side that is more than happy to cackle over this prospect, and my statistical background is weak, but my husband&#039;s isn&#039;t and he finds these numbers odd too.  Is the thing we&#039;re dealing with here not a normal distribution, in which case &quot;standard deviation&quot; is a misleading term?  We are baffled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This feels wrong.  25% of a standard deviation is 60% of a year&#8217;s worth of learning?  Shall I conclude that one standard deviation is 2.4 years&#8217; worth of learning per year, and conclude thereby that a substantial fraction of students are forgetting more than a year&#8217;s worth of material per year?  I mean, I have a cynical side that is more than happy to cackle over this prospect, and my statistical background is weak, but my husband&#8217;s isn&#8217;t and he finds these numbers odd too.  Is the thing we&#8217;re dealing with here not a normal distribution, in which case &#8220;standard deviation&#8221; is a misleading term?  We are baffled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

