<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stimulus and strings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/01/stimulus-and-strings-for-schools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/01/stimulus-and-strings-for-schools/</link>
	<description>Thinking and Linking by Joanne Jacobs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:51:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/01/stimulus-and-strings-for-schools/#comment-43278</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/?p=7298#comment-43278</guid>
		<description>I would be willing to bet that here in Texas the Legislature will make a dollar per dollar cut in state funding for every dollar from the feds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be willing to bet that here in Texas the Legislature will make a dollar per dollar cut in state funding for every dollar from the feds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/01/stimulus-and-strings-for-schools/#comment-43277</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/?p=7298#comment-43277</guid>
		<description>So, 142 billion dollars for education.  Considering that there are about 36 million school children in the US, that&#039;s almost $4,000 per kid.

What will we get for it?  I don&#039;t know, but I&#039;m sure one of the things we won&#039;t get is measurably better educated kids.

No &quot;change&quot; there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, 142 billion dollars for education.  Considering that there are about 36 million school children in the US, that&#8217;s almost $4,000 per kid.</p>
<p>What will we get for it?  I don&#8217;t know, but I&#8217;m sure one of the things we won&#8217;t get is measurably better educated kids.</p>
<p>No &#8220;change&#8221; there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/01/stimulus-and-strings-for-schools/#comment-43276</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/?p=7298#comment-43276</guid>
		<description>The original money was a slush fund. The extra $142 million will not help anyone. It will just make federal spending &quot;slushier.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original money was a slush fund. The extra $142 million will not help anyone. It will just make federal spending &#8220;slushier.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Crimson Avenger</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/01/stimulus-and-strings-for-schools/#comment-43275</link>
		<dc:creator>The Crimson Avenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/?p=7298#comment-43275</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s leave aside the fact that this is certainly not stimulative spending (the original purpose of the bill), and that, as Barone argues, states can effectively paper over any mandates for changes in operations. My question is: what&#039;s to prevent the states, which are hurting generally, from reducing their allocations to education in the exact amounts of this new federal increase?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s leave aside the fact that this is certainly not stimulative spending (the original purpose of the bill), and that, as Barone argues, states can effectively paper over any mandates for changes in operations. My question is: what&#8217;s to prevent the states, which are hurting generally, from reducing their allocations to education in the exact amounts of this new federal increase?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homeschooling Granny</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/01/stimulus-and-strings-for-schools/#comment-43274</link>
		<dc:creator>Homeschooling Granny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/?p=7298#comment-43274</guid>
		<description>Discouraging. (1) No change from the same old reliance on multiple choice tests w/o addressing the concerns as to the negative impact of such tests on teaching. (2) A top down mandate to get good teachers into hard-to-staff schools with no realistic suggestions as to how this might be done. How about identifying such schools that DO maintain a good staff and copy them. (3)Tracking data is commons sense but if the data input is meaningless (see point 1) it won&#039;t help much. 

The USA has a federal system. It could be used to test different approaches and adopt the ones that are the most productive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Discouraging. (1) No change from the same old reliance on multiple choice tests w/o addressing the concerns as to the negative impact of such tests on teaching. (2) A top down mandate to get good teachers into hard-to-staff schools with no realistic suggestions as to how this might be done. How about identifying such schools that DO maintain a good staff and copy them. (3)Tracking data is commons sense but if the data input is meaningless (see point 1) it won&#8217;t help much. </p>
<p>The USA has a federal system. It could be used to test different approaches and adopt the ones that are the most productive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Spending &#8220;The Big Winner&#8221; in Stimulus Package at The Core Knowledge Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2009/01/stimulus-and-strings-for-schools/#comment-43273</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Spending &#8220;The Big Winner&#8221; in Stimulus Package at The Core Knowledge Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/?p=7298#comment-43273</guid>
		<description>[...] Jacobs has more.  Charles Barone at Swift and Change Able, has a detailed analysis and notes this will be the [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jacobs has more.  Charles Barone at Swift and Change Able, has a detailed analysis and notes this will be the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

