Comments on: Hollow man

By: Alice Finterhaven

Alice Finterhaven — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:12:31 +0000

The difference between Edwards and Obama is that Obama hasn’t reached that point yet. Given who he’s married to, he’ll probably get there before long, though. Shallow men. Very shallow, like politicians who will say anything to get what they want.

By: BadaBing

BadaBing — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:29:06 +0000

Itâ€™s not the adultery, writes Roger Simon.

No, the adultery is okay. No problem with that. Everybody does it now, so we’ve removed it from the No-No List.

By: Wolf 359 Vet

Wolf 359 Vet — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:27:48 +0000

Makes you wonder what’s going on in John McCain’s, Barack Obama’s, and Bob Barr’s lives that we don’t know about…

Not to say that anyone running for office has to be a perfect human being; they’re as flawed as the rest of us, and should be understood to be so. But there are differences between just being “flawed” and being a “scumbag”…

By: Mike

Mike — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:53:31 +0000

The fact that George Bush is now the president tells you a lot more about our country, and none of it’s good.

By: Wolf 359 Vet

Wolf 359 Vet — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:36:27 +0000

If John Edwards had been elected President, he would have made Richard Nixon look good in comparison.

The fact that he made it to the point of running for President, and then considered as a choice for Vice President, tells you something about our country today.

It also makes you wonder what the politicians we DID elect have gotten away with that we just don’t know about (or may never know about).

By: Rob

Rob — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:01:34 +0000

Sheesh, what a maroon. The program was only burning a couple hundred thousand per year, chump change for Edwards. Why not fund it for just one more year (giving some warning to those expecting the program to continue forever) and bow out gracefully?

This makes him look incredibly petty, which is not attractive when combined with vain, sleazy and untrustworthy.