<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joannejacobs.com/2008/07/preview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2008/07/preview/</link>
	<description>Thinking and Linking by Joanne Jacobs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:28:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reality Czech</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2008/07/preview/#comment-37703</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality Czech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/?p=5643#comment-37703</guid>
		<description>If it means moving comments to different pages, don&#039;t do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it means moving comments to different pages, don&#8217;t do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BadaBing</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2008/07/preview/#comment-37702</link>
		<dc:creator>BadaBing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/?p=5643#comment-37702</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t fix it if it ain&#039;t broke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t fix it if it ain&#8217;t broke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoogleMaster</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2008/07/preview/#comment-37701</link>
		<dc:creator>GoogleMaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/?p=5643#comment-37701</guid>
		<description>Preview -- yes, already used it.  :D
Threading -- maybe.
Voting on comments like slashdot -- no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preview &#8212; yes, already used it.  <img src='http://www.joannejacobs.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Threading &#8212; maybe.<br />
Voting on comments like slashdot &#8212; no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Sweeny</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2008/07/preview/#comment-37700</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Sweeny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/?p=5643#comment-37700</guid>
		<description>And I make five.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I make five.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wahoofive</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2008/07/preview/#comment-37699</link>
		<dc:creator>wahoofive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 21:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/?p=5643#comment-37699</guid>
		<description>Ditto, ditto, ditto.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto, ditto, ditto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusha Sams</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2008/07/preview/#comment-37698</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusha Sams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 20:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/?p=5643#comment-37698</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve got a good thing going now.  I&#039;m not so sure that threading would improve it.  I, too, like seeing all comments on single page.  Best of luck making a decision!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got a good thing going now.  I&#8217;m not so sure that threading would improve it.  I, too, like seeing all comments on single page.  Best of luck making a decision!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quincy</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2008/07/preview/#comment-37697</link>
		<dc:creator>Quincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 19:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/?p=5643#comment-37697</guid>
		<description>I think Amritas has it right.  Other than the preview (thanks!), I think the comment format you&#039;ve got works quite well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Amritas has it right.  Other than the preview (thanks!), I think the comment format you&#8217;ve got works quite well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amritas</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2008/07/preview/#comment-37696</link>
		<dc:creator>Amritas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 17:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/?p=5643#comment-37696</guid>
		<description>I prefer the current format which allows me to see all comments on a single page.  I find it tiresome to click on each thread to read it.  Moreover, the neatness that threading promises breaks down when people start redundant threads or go off-thread within a thread.

Comment ratings amount to a popularity contest. Those who say the &quot;wrong&quot; things will be penalized.  Although most would agree that trolls should get low ratings, this blog doesn&#039;t suffer from trolling, so unpopular views will be penalized.  Is this the best way to deal with &quot;wrong&quot; ideas?  I&#039;d rather argue against a position than give no stars to a comment I don&#039;t agree with.

And I might agree with that comment later.  Suppose a commenter says something that seems &quot;wrong&quot; at first and &quot;deserving&quot; of no stars. Then that commenter explains himself and suddenly his position makes a lot of sense.  It might even be &quot;right.&quot;  Do we give that commenter&#039;s new post five stars?  Ratings may tell us more about the rater than the quality of the comments themselves.  They can help to build a like-minded community, but they don&#039;t encourage the dissent that is inevitable from &quot;free-linking and thinking,&quot; to quote the top of this blog.

I&#039;m not opposed to all change.  I&#039;m looking forward to using the &quot;Preview&quot; feature after I finish this sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer the current format which allows me to see all comments on a single page.  I find it tiresome to click on each thread to read it.  Moreover, the neatness that threading promises breaks down when people start redundant threads or go off-thread within a thread.</p>
<p>Comment ratings amount to a popularity contest. Those who say the &#8220;wrong&#8221; things will be penalized.  Although most would agree that trolls should get low ratings, this blog doesn&#8217;t suffer from trolling, so unpopular views will be penalized.  Is this the best way to deal with &#8220;wrong&#8221; ideas?  I&#8217;d rather argue against a position than give no stars to a comment I don&#8217;t agree with.</p>
<p>And I might agree with that comment later.  Suppose a commenter says something that seems &#8220;wrong&#8221; at first and &#8220;deserving&#8221; of no stars. Then that commenter explains himself and suddenly his position makes a lot of sense.  It might even be &#8220;right.&#8221;  Do we give that commenter&#8217;s new post five stars?  Ratings may tell us more about the rater than the quality of the comments themselves.  They can help to build a like-minded community, but they don&#8217;t encourage the dissent that is inevitable from &#8220;free-linking and thinking,&#8221; to quote the top of this blog.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not opposed to all change.  I&#8217;m looking forward to using the &#8220;Preview&#8221; feature after I finish this sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Eagleson</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2008/07/preview/#comment-37695</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Eagleson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 16:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/?p=5643#comment-37695</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll second Mr. Foster.  Most places I&#039;ve seen it, comment threading winds up being a bug, not a feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll second Mr. Foster.  Most places I&#8217;ve seen it, comment threading winds up being a bug, not a feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2008/07/preview/#comment-37694</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/?p=5643#comment-37694</guid>
		<description>&quot;Readers can rate comments to help make sure only good comments stay in the conversation.&quot;

Ugh. Do you really want your readers to censor &quot;bad&quot; comments? That encourages a nice little echo chamber. And I agree with Foster about the threaded comments. Not needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Readers can rate comments to help make sure only good comments stay in the conversation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ugh. Do you really want your readers to censor &#8220;bad&#8221; comments? That encourages a nice little echo chamber. And I agree with Foster about the threaded comments. Not needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

