College is a waste of time and money for below-average students and party animals, writes career counselor Marty Nemko in Chronicle of Higher Education.
Among high-school students who graduated in the bottom 40 percent of their classes, and whose first institutions were four-year colleges, two-thirds had not earned diplomas eight and a half years later.
Drop-outs leave with little learning and a lot of debt. Those who scrape through “rarely end up in careers that require a college education.”
College benefits competent, motivated and sober students, Nemko writes. But they’re the minority.
Today, amazingly, a majority of the students whom colleges admit are grossly underprepared. Only 23 percent of the 1.3 million high-school graduates of 2007 who took the ACT examination were ready for college-level work in the core subjects of English, math, reading, and science.
Nemko suggests colleges be required to test new and graduating students to show what value has been added by their years in college.
Some of the test should be in career contexts: the ability to draft a persuasive memo, analyze an employer’s financial report, or use online research tools to develop content for a report.
Tests results, broken out by precollege SAT scores, race and gender, would “encourage institutions to improve their undergraduate education and to admit only students likely to derive enough benefit to justify the time, tuition and opportunity costs.”
Would-be late bloomers who start at community college can earn transfer credits or a vocational certificate without piling on debt.
I don’t foresee a mandatory value-added test but I think parents and students are becoming more cost sensitive. A few nights ago, my husband’s college-educated cousins told us they’re pleased that their teen-age son wants to be an electrician. He’s good at electrical work, he enjoys it and he’s going to earn his own way very quickly.


Recent Comments