<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: College is hard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joannejacobs.com/2007/05/college-is-hard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2007/05/college-is-hard/</link>
	<description>Thinking and Linking by Joanne Jacobs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:47:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CCPhysicist</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2007/05/college-is-hard/#comment-33173</link>
		<dc:creator>CCPhysicist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 01:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/2007/05/02/college-is-hard/#comment-33173</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m no right winger, but I agree with RWP and Joanne on most of the above.  But I do not blame the high schools.  Sure, you could raise the rigor of some classes, but it would still be true that college is different from high school.  It is a reality that students are required to attend HS and that HS teachers are expected to find a way to pass the vast majority of a class.  College students do not have to attend class and we do not have to pass them.  And this applies at the top end as well as the bottom.  

Wayne, take a look at the links in 
http://doctorpion.blogspot.com/2007/04/grade-13-at-ishkabibble-community.html
about how students entering JHU have not been prepared for a true college level class by their AP classes.  There are similar points made in the discussions linked from 
http://doctorpion.blogspot.com/2007/03/my-thoughts-on-college-readiness.html

I&#039;ll take an &quot;unprepared&quot; student who understands the concept of prerequisites, and learns what is in each class, over a kid who &quot;took&quot; an AP class that took two years to do two semesters of college math with essentially no chance of failing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no right winger, but I agree with RWP and Joanne on most of the above.  But I do not blame the high schools.  Sure, you could raise the rigor of some classes, but it would still be true that college is different from high school.  It is a reality that students are required to attend HS and that HS teachers are expected to find a way to pass the vast majority of a class.  College students do not have to attend class and we do not have to pass them.  And this applies at the top end as well as the bottom.  </p>
<p>Wayne, take a look at the links in<br />
<a href="http://doctorpion.blogspot.com/2007/04/grade-13-at-ishkabibble-community.html" rel="nofollow">http://doctorpion.blogspot.com/2007/04/grade-13-at-ishkabibble-community.html</a><br />
about how students entering JHU have not been prepared for a true college level class by their AP classes.  There are similar points made in the discussions linked from<br />
<a href="http://doctorpion.blogspot.com/2007/03/my-thoughts-on-college-readiness.html" rel="nofollow">http://doctorpion.blogspot.com/2007/03/my-thoughts-on-college-readiness.html</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll take an &#8220;unprepared&#8221; student who understands the concept of prerequisites, and learns what is in each class, over a kid who &#8220;took&#8221; an AP class that took two years to do two semesters of college math with essentially no chance of failing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricki</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2007/05/college-is-hard/#comment-33172</link>
		<dc:creator>ricki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 12:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/2007/05/02/college-is-hard/#comment-33172</guid>
		<description>I will say back when I was in college (at a Public Ivy), some of us in the &quot;hard sciences&quot; used to say:

people who can&#039;t do hard science go into psychology.
If they can&#039;t handle psychology, they go into poli sci
If they can&#039;t handle poli sci, they go into communications.

yeah, stereotypical and snarky, but 18-20 year olds tend to be a snarky lot.

I suspect that what&#039;s true is that we&#039;re seeing a widening gap of knowledge base - people who have all the APs vs. people who are really not prepared (knowledge-wise) to go to college.

But there&#039;s also the issue of motivation and drive. If you were pushed like crazy by your parents to succeed in high school, that doesn&#039;t necessarily mean you will succeed in college, when you&#039;re living away from them, and have added distractions (alcohol, parties, potential hook-ups, your roommate&#039;s video game) that the parents may not have permitted. You can be really &quot;smart&quot; and yet be really &quot;dumb.&quot; I&#039;ve seen A students slide into a pit of Ds because they discovered something that was &quot;more fun&quot; than college, or because they got hooked on online poker, or because they joined the party scene. It happens, and it&#039;s sad when the student&#039;s not able to pull out of it.

I tend to think - just from having compared my experience in the early 90s as a beginning TA to today - that incoming students are, on average, less mature now. They&#039;re more likely to come and beg for a better grade (when they don&#039;t deserve it) - or, worse, have their parents call the prof and ask for a better grade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will say back when I was in college (at a Public Ivy), some of us in the &#8220;hard sciences&#8221; used to say:</p>
<p>people who can&#8217;t do hard science go into psychology.<br />
If they can&#8217;t handle psychology, they go into poli sci<br />
If they can&#8217;t handle poli sci, they go into communications.</p>
<p>yeah, stereotypical and snarky, but 18-20 year olds tend to be a snarky lot.</p>
<p>I suspect that what&#8217;s true is that we&#8217;re seeing a widening gap of knowledge base &#8211; people who have all the APs vs. people who are really not prepared (knowledge-wise) to go to college.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s also the issue of motivation and drive. If you were pushed like crazy by your parents to succeed in high school, that doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean you will succeed in college, when you&#8217;re living away from them, and have added distractions (alcohol, parties, potential hook-ups, your roommate&#8217;s video game) that the parents may not have permitted. You can be really &#8220;smart&#8221; and yet be really &#8220;dumb.&#8221; I&#8217;ve seen A students slide into a pit of Ds because they discovered something that was &#8220;more fun&#8221; than college, or because they got hooked on online poker, or because they joined the party scene. It happens, and it&#8217;s sad when the student&#8217;s not able to pull out of it.</p>
<p>I tend to think &#8211; just from having compared my experience in the early 90s as a beginning TA to today &#8211; that incoming students are, on average, less mature now. They&#8217;re more likely to come and beg for a better grade (when they don&#8217;t deserve it) &#8211; or, worse, have their parents call the prof and ask for a better grade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superdestroyer</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2007/05/college-is-hard/#comment-33171</link>
		<dc:creator>superdestroyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 09:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/2007/05/02/college-is-hard/#comment-33171</guid>
		<description>If people are wanting data points, you can use college guides to provide a little more insight than colleges really want to reveal. 

Virtually every Ivy league and Ivy-lke has the same three majors as their top majors (economics, political science, and psychology). All of those students who are taking AP physics, calculus, biology, chemistry, etc; seem to end up avoiding those classes in college. 

Also, college guides publish graduation rates, lenght of time to graduate, etc.  The average state university has a graduation rate of less than 50%, the students take longer than four years, and most students change their major at least once. 

My personal experience is that no one ever decides that economics is too easy and changes into biochemistry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If people are wanting data points, you can use college guides to provide a little more insight than colleges really want to reveal. </p>
<p>Virtually every Ivy league and Ivy-lke has the same three majors as their top majors (economics, political science, and psychology). All of those students who are taking AP physics, calculus, biology, chemistry, etc; seem to end up avoiding those classes in college. </p>
<p>Also, college guides publish graduation rates, lenght of time to graduate, etc.  The average state university has a graduation rate of less than 50%, the students take longer than four years, and most students change their major at least once. </p>
<p>My personal experience is that no one ever decides that economics is too easy and changes into biochemistry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter E. Wallis</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2007/05/college-is-hard/#comment-33170</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter E. Wallis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 01:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/2007/05/02/college-is-hard/#comment-33170</guid>
		<description>Admission should be strictly by SAT. Except for football players. And exceptionally cute co-eds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admission should be strictly by SAT. Except for football players. And exceptionally cute co-eds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cardinal Fang</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2007/05/college-is-hard/#comment-33169</link>
		<dc:creator>Cardinal Fang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 00:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/2007/05/02/college-is-hard/#comment-33169</guid>
		<description>Right Wing Prof, if you&#039;re still here, what kind of school do you teach at? I know that there are plenty of the kind of students you describe in community college, and I&#039;m willing to believe there are plenty of such students at mid-tier colleges. I would be surprised (but not stunned) to learn that such students are common at the kind of top universities (Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, et cetera) that are the subject of all the articles about how hard it is to get into top colleges these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right Wing Prof, if you&#8217;re still here, what kind of school do you teach at? I know that there are plenty of the kind of students you describe in community college, and I&#8217;m willing to believe there are plenty of such students at mid-tier colleges. I would be surprised (but not stunned) to learn that such students are common at the kind of top universities (Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, et cetera) that are the subject of all the articles about how hard it is to get into top colleges these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wayne martin</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2007/05/college-is-hard/#comment-33168</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 22:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/2007/05/02/college-is-hard/#comment-33168</guid>
		<description>The unnamed poster RWP seems to have taken great umbrage with my some of last posting:
----
Wayne Wrote:

â€œWith the emergence of AP courses, the difficulty of 
high school (at least the last two years) has 
increased for those headed to college.â€

RWP:
Yet colleges are now having to enroll more and more students in remedial. high-school level courses, such as basic algebra. Can you explain this apparent contradiction?

Wayne Responds:
This is true.  It doesnâ€™t appear to be true in the top tier colleges, or at least not so much that there are news articles that track the issue.  

We need to remember that there has been a huge increase in college attendance since WWII.  The college graduation rate was about 12% (as evidenced by the number of college grads that were inducted into the Armed Forces).  Now, we are seeing a graduation rate of 25% nationally, with an attendance rate of about 75% (if memory serves). 

I started high school in 1959, so my frame-of-reference with high school/college education is about fifty years.  A goodly number of colleges have been built since the end of WWII.  Obviously, students are needed to fill the classrooms.  If those students are not ready for college, they end up in remedial classes, leave or flunk out.  If not as many colleges and CCs had been built, then not as many students would be entering, the entrance bars could be higher.  

My comments about â€œdifficulty of high schoolâ€ are based on my memory about the course work that I took when I went through high school (1959-1963) vs the coursework that kids in my town are taking as they start their path in life (ca 2007). As I pointed out, AP courses in Calculus and Physics didnâ€™t exist in the early â€˜60s (in my part of the country at least).  Since they do exist in high school now, it was offered as â€œdataâ€ to explain my point-of-view. It seemed like â€œdataâ€ to me, but if it does not qualify as â€œdataâ€ to you .. What precise data and in what format would you expect me to offer so that it would pass your exacting expectations?

Wayne Wrote:
â€œCertainly AP classes have increased the knowledge-base to 
which students are exposed these days over what we 
were exposed to 35-40 years ago.â€

RWP Objects:
And again, another statement with nothing to back it up. 

Wayne Responds:
This is an opinion, to be sure.  But being old enough to have started public school over 55 years ago, I do have some memory into what we were taught in those years, and can easily see what kids are being taught today. It really is not that difficult to make a mental difference and express an opinion.  (Perhaps I should apologize to RWP for taking the time to share my memories of life in the early 1950s in the South with folks like himself!)

There isnâ€™t enough time or space in Blogs such as these to do much more than exchange opinions .. sad RWP does not see that.

RWP Wrote:
What do you do, exactly, that makes you such an authority 
on education, particularly higher education? 
I must have missed that part.

Wayne Responded:
This is an anonymous Blog, so what I do isnâ€™t really all that important.  However, since you have demanded so imperiously that I identify my occupation, I will tell you I am a systems analyst.  My knowledge of higher education is limited to my own undergraduate and graduate experiences, and the vast seas of data available from various agencies, such as the DoEs at every level of government.  The Internet makes a lot of data available today that used to exist only in unwieldy tomes, which I found myself reading, from time-to-time.

RWP Wrote:
Iâ€™ll consider you an authority when youâ€™ve taught 
university courses for over two decades.

Wayne Responded:

I have never claimed to be an authority on Education, I have simply provided data which is readily available in the public domain about education.  It is a sharing of information, not an assertion of authority.  

By the way, Herr Doctor .. 

I fully supported your opinion piece, and didnâ€™t think that I wrote anything that was disrespectful, or called your observations into question.  I generally agree with you, but I can see now that you probably arenâ€™t interested in having folks like myself on your side. 

Looks like decades of standing behind a podium has detuned your friend-vs-foe detector to a point where it doesnâ€™t work any more.  You might want to look into getting it fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The unnamed poster RWP seems to have taken great umbrage with my some of last posting:<br />
&#8212;-<br />
Wayne Wrote:</p>
<p>â€œWith the emergence of AP courses, the difficulty of<br />
high school (at least the last two years) has<br />
increased for those headed to college.â€</p>
<p>RWP:<br />
Yet colleges are now having to enroll more and more students in remedial. high-school level courses, such as basic algebra. Can you explain this apparent contradiction?</p>
<p>Wayne Responds:<br />
This is true.  It doesnâ€™t appear to be true in the top tier colleges, or at least not so much that there are news articles that track the issue.  </p>
<p>We need to remember that there has been a huge increase in college attendance since WWII.  The college graduation rate was about 12% (as evidenced by the number of college grads that were inducted into the Armed Forces).  Now, we are seeing a graduation rate of 25% nationally, with an attendance rate of about 75% (if memory serves). </p>
<p>I started high school in 1959, so my frame-of-reference with high school/college education is about fifty years.  A goodly number of colleges have been built since the end of WWII.  Obviously, students are needed to fill the classrooms.  If those students are not ready for college, they end up in remedial classes, leave or flunk out.  If not as many colleges and CCs had been built, then not as many students would be entering, the entrance bars could be higher.  </p>
<p>My comments about â€œdifficulty of high schoolâ€ are based on my memory about the course work that I took when I went through high school (1959-1963) vs the coursework that kids in my town are taking as they start their path in life (ca 2007). As I pointed out, AP courses in Calculus and Physics didnâ€™t exist in the early â€˜60s (in my part of the country at least).  Since they do exist in high school now, it was offered as â€œdataâ€ to explain my point-of-view. It seemed like â€œdataâ€ to me, but if it does not qualify as â€œdataâ€ to you .. What precise data and in what format would you expect me to offer so that it would pass your exacting expectations?</p>
<p>Wayne Wrote:<br />
â€œCertainly AP classes have increased the knowledge-base to<br />
which students are exposed these days over what we<br />
were exposed to 35-40 years ago.â€</p>
<p>RWP Objects:<br />
And again, another statement with nothing to back it up. </p>
<p>Wayne Responds:<br />
This is an opinion, to be sure.  But being old enough to have started public school over 55 years ago, I do have some memory into what we were taught in those years, and can easily see what kids are being taught today. It really is not that difficult to make a mental difference and express an opinion.  (Perhaps I should apologize to RWP for taking the time to share my memories of life in the early 1950s in the South with folks like himself!)</p>
<p>There isnâ€™t enough time or space in Blogs such as these to do much more than exchange opinions .. sad RWP does not see that.</p>
<p>RWP Wrote:<br />
What do you do, exactly, that makes you such an authority<br />
on education, particularly higher education?<br />
I must have missed that part.</p>
<p>Wayne Responded:<br />
This is an anonymous Blog, so what I do isnâ€™t really all that important.  However, since you have demanded so imperiously that I identify my occupation, I will tell you I am a systems analyst.  My knowledge of higher education is limited to my own undergraduate and graduate experiences, and the vast seas of data available from various agencies, such as the DoEs at every level of government.  The Internet makes a lot of data available today that used to exist only in unwieldy tomes, which I found myself reading, from time-to-time.</p>
<p>RWP Wrote:<br />
Iâ€™ll consider you an authority when youâ€™ve taught<br />
university courses for over two decades.</p>
<p>Wayne Responded:</p>
<p>I have never claimed to be an authority on Education, I have simply provided data which is readily available in the public domain about education.  It is a sharing of information, not an assertion of authority.  </p>
<p>By the way, Herr Doctor .. </p>
<p>I fully supported your opinion piece, and didnâ€™t think that I wrote anything that was disrespectful, or called your observations into question.  I generally agree with you, but I can see now that you probably arenâ€™t interested in having folks like myself on your side. </p>
<p>Looks like decades of standing behind a podium has detuned your friend-vs-foe detector to a point where it doesnâ€™t work any more.  You might want to look into getting it fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quotes of the week at exvigilare</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2007/05/college-is-hard/#comment-33167</link>
		<dc:creator>Quotes of the week at exvigilare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 21:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/2007/05/02/college-is-hard/#comment-33167</guid>
		<description>[...] Jacobs, on the difficulty level in college: Perhaps too many students have gone through their K-12 years designing posters rather [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jacobs, on the difficulty level in college: Perhaps too many students have gone through their K-12 years designing posters rather [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hardlyb</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2007/05/college-is-hard/#comment-33166</link>
		<dc:creator>hardlyb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 20:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/2007/05/02/college-is-hard/#comment-33166</guid>
		<description>Cal, I wasn&#039;t conflating brilliant and prepared, I was taking the intersection. The article linked to in the entry with the title &quot;When brilliant isnâ€™t good enough&quot; described kids that the author clearly thought were both brilliant and prepared. I&#039;m biased enough to think that my daughter qualifies as &quot;brilliant&quot; (her IQ is over 170, for whatever that&#039;s worth) even though it&#039;s not a term I use in daily conversation, and she&#039;s working very hard on her education. What she isn&#039;t doing is spending a lot of time on the sort of stuff that fills the resumes of the kids in these articles. Realistically, interning with NASA on a groundbreaking study on weightlessness in mice, for almost all high school kids, means feeding the animals and cleaning their cages. I&#039;d rather my daughter take upper-division math classes at the local university next year (since that&#039;s what she wants to do), rather than get such an internship, sell ads for a high school yearbook, or volunteer at a homeless shelter. But I worry that she&#039;ll have trouble getting into college because she won&#039;t look as impressive as the other kids, since the things about her that are really impressive could go right over the heads of the people in the admissions office, or that they will decide that she&#039;s not &quot;well-rounded&quot; enough. Or something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cal, I wasn&#8217;t conflating brilliant and prepared, I was taking the intersection. The article linked to in the entry with the title &#8220;When brilliant isnâ€™t good enough&#8221; described kids that the author clearly thought were both brilliant and prepared. I&#8217;m biased enough to think that my daughter qualifies as &#8220;brilliant&#8221; (her IQ is over 170, for whatever that&#8217;s worth) even though it&#8217;s not a term I use in daily conversation, and she&#8217;s working very hard on her education. What she isn&#8217;t doing is spending a lot of time on the sort of stuff that fills the resumes of the kids in these articles. Realistically, interning with NASA on a groundbreaking study on weightlessness in mice, for almost all high school kids, means feeding the animals and cleaning their cages. I&#8217;d rather my daughter take upper-division math classes at the local university next year (since that&#8217;s what she wants to do), rather than get such an internship, sell ads for a high school yearbook, or volunteer at a homeless shelter. But I worry that she&#8217;ll have trouble getting into college because she won&#8217;t look as impressive as the other kids, since the things about her that are really impressive could go right over the heads of the people in the admissions office, or that they will decide that she&#8217;s not &#8220;well-rounded&#8221; enough. Or something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cal</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2007/05/college-is-hard/#comment-33165</link>
		<dc:creator>Cal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 19:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/2007/05/02/college-is-hard/#comment-33165</guid>
		<description>&quot;Can you explain this apparent contradiction?&quot;

The contradiction is all of your own invention.  I didn&#039;t make the second and third statements. Someone called &quot;Wayne&quot; did. 

Joanne--exactly. But that&#039;s why it&#039;s so odd that everyone tries to discuss &quot;college students&quot;.

&quot;There are lots of good college opportunities for these students, even if they canâ€™t all go to the Ivy League.&quot;

Yes. The rather absurd focus on grades is putting a lot of exceptionally bright, well-educated students at places like UC Santas Barbara and Cruz, as well as Davis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Can you explain this apparent contradiction?&#8221;</p>
<p>The contradiction is all of your own invention.  I didn&#8217;t make the second and third statements. Someone called &#8220;Wayne&#8221; did. </p>
<p>Joanne&#8211;exactly. But that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s so odd that everyone tries to discuss &#8220;college students&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;There are lots of good college opportunities for these students, even if they canâ€™t all go to the Ivy League.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes. The rather absurd focus on grades is putting a lot of exceptionally bright, well-educated students at places like UC Santas Barbara and Cruz, as well as Davis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanne</title>
		<link>http://www.joannejacobs.com/2007/05/college-is-hard/#comment-33164</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 19:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobs.com/2007/05/02/college-is-hard/#comment-33164</guid>
		<description>I agree that the best students are doing far more than the best students of my era. There are lots of good college opportunities for these students, even if they can&#039;t all go to the Ivy League.

When I was graduated from high school in 1970, most A and many B students went to college; C students went only if they had wealthy families to finance them. These days, most C students go to college, even if they lack motivation, good work habits and solid reading, writing and math skills. D students go too, though they end up in remedial community college classes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the best students are doing far more than the best students of my era. There are lots of good college opportunities for these students, even if they can&#8217;t all go to the Ivy League.</p>
<p>When I was graduated from high school in 1970, most A and many B students went to college; C students went only if they had wealthy families to finance them. These days, most C students go to college, even if they lack motivation, good work habits and solid reading, writing and math skills. D students go too, though they end up in remedial community college classes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

