Pessimistic teachers

One in four teachers in urban schools say most of their students won’t be successful at a community college or university, according to a survey sponsored by the National School Boards Association. A slightly higher percentage say students “are not motivated to learn” and parents aren’t supportive.

In all, 23.6% of public school teachers at all levels say success in college would elude most students in their school. An additional 18% say they aren’t sure.

One in eight teachers say their school is not a safe place.

A school and a home

The Children’s Project will open a grades 7-12 residential charter school in Santa Barbara County to serve teenagers in foster care. Organizers plan a “year-round, academically rigorous program within a community of support, stability, and continuity.”

Donors have provided money to buy a rural site, which will include housing for students, faculty and for seniors who will act as foster grandparents. Currently, there are few families in the county willing to take in teenagers who require foster care; most are sent out of the county.

At the California Charter Schools Conference yesterday, one of the founders told me they’d decided to start their own charter school at the residential facility after reading my book, Our School. I was moved.

Foster children who “age out” at 18 tend to do very poorly in life with high rates of welfare dependency, incarceration and homelessness. It’s estimated only 54 percent complete high school and 2 percent earn a college degree.

The harm of preferment

Admission preferences for “legacies” with below-average grades and test scores may backfire, concludes a study by Princeton researchers. According to Chronicle of Higher Education, “legacies” “are far more likely than minority students or athletes to run into academic trouble in college if admissions preferences got them through the door.”

The farther a selective college lowers the bar for a given legacy applicant — as measured by the gap between that applicant’s grade-point average and the mean for that institution — the lower the grade-point average that the student is likely to earn, according to a paper written by the two researchers who conducted the study, Douglas S. Massey, a professor of sociology and public affairs, and Margarita Mooney, a postdoctoral fellow in Princeton’s Office of Population Research.

. . . The paper says the researchers found that students who had received extra consideration in admission because they are black, Hispanic, or athletes did not have the same academic problems as legacies, as measured by grades or retention rates, even if college policies of giving minority students and athletes extra consideration in admissions appeared to have some drawbacks.

But preference-receiving “legacies” earn higher grades than students admitted because of minority status or athletics, points out John Rosenberg on Discriminations.

“About 70 percent of athletes, 77 percent of black and Hispanic students, and just 48 percent of legacies had SAT scores below their institution’s average,” researchers found. On average, the legacy preference was worth 47 SAT points; athletes and black or Hispanic students received a boost of about 108 SAT points, the Chronicle reports.

On the whole, legacies fared better than the other two populations studied in terms of grades; their mean grade-point average at the end of two years of college was 3.26, compared with 3.12 for athletes and 3.05 for students categorized as black or Hispanic. In terms of their retention rates, legacies were in the middle: 5 percent of athletes, 7 percent of legacies, and 11 percent of black or Hispanic students had dropped out by the end of their junior year.

Rosenberg wonders why the preference is seen as harmful to legacies but OK for others. He also questions the theory that “social climate” — the perception that preference beneficiaries are less capable — depresses academic performance.

Gee, is everything a function of “social climate”? Couldn’t the difficulty of students who are admitted to selective institutions with significantly lower academic qualifications than their non-preferred peers be caused by the simpler fact that they were not as prepared to do the work that is expected there?

There must be an apples and oranges problem here. (Only the abstract is online for free.)

My freshman year at Stanford, I roomed for a quarter with the daughter of major donors to the university. She did not appear to be very smart but it was hard to tell because of her heavy drug use. When she flunked out, I roomed with a Native American girl who had no money and no family support of any kind. She’d figured out early that education was her route out of a life she hated. She remains the hardest-working person I’ve ever met in my life. Years later, I ran into her ex-husband who told me she’d fulfilled her life goal: Get out of Dinuba. Stay out of Dinuba.

A ‘digital decade’ of school tech

Education Week’s Technology Counts 2007 is now up (no registration required). EdWeek finds schools have closed the digital divide for the most part, though low-income students are much less likely to use computers at home.

Digital cameras and videorecorders, coupled with photo-sharing and moviemaking software, are putting new, easier-to-use means of expression into students’ and educators’ hands.

Interactive software applications such as blogs, podcasts, and social-networking sites are letting students and teachers easily post their own writings and multimedia presentations on the Web. Digital whiteboards and liquid-crystal-display projectors are giving some classrooms a high-tech feel once reserved for corporate boardrooms.

Virtual education, in its infancy a decade ago, is going mainstream. Hundreds of thousands of students go online for some or all of their courses—a trend that is opening up opportunities, such as Advanced Placement classes, that would otherwise be unavailable. Teachers, for their part, are turning to the Web for professional development.
From Connectivity to Creativity

In addition, students are more likely to take tests on computers and teachers are using technology to gather and analyze data.

Are students learning more because of technology? Not clear says the report. Research has focused mostly on innovative uses of technology with few scientifically valid studies focused on whether students are learning more.

Several recent research reviews and meta-analyses published in the United States and in Britain suggest that, when measured across the board, educational technology yields “small, but significant” gains in learning and in student engagement. The problem is that those modest gains fell short of advocates’ promises.

Most of the giddiness of the hook ‘em up era is gone now. Federal funding for unproven technology is drying up. Education technology will have to compete with other school needs.

Technology Counts includes state technology reports.

Carnival of Education

Visit the Carnival of Education at The Ed Wonks.

Starting right

One in five children under the age of eight comes from a Latino family, reports the Washington Post.

Latino children nationwide tend to start kindergarten knowing less about letters and numbers compared with their non-Hispanic white peers. Many never catch up. Improving early childhood education is one of the best ways to narrow the achievement gap, educators say, citing such programs as the family book club. But many Latino families face economic, linguistic, educational and even cultural barriers.”It’s partly about parents not understanding the American system,” said Eugene E. Garcia, an Arizona State University administrator and chairman of the National Task Force on Early Childhood Education for Hispanics. “Hispanic parents think school is good and education is good. They just don’t have the tools they need.”

About 40 percent of Latino 3- and 4-year-olds (and 5-year-olds not yet in kindergarten) are enrolled in pre-kindergarten programs, compared with about 60 percent of white and African American children, according to the District-based advocacy group Pre-K Now. In addition, a new report from Garcia’s task force noted that Hispanic mothers generally read and talk less to their children compared with white parents. Hispanic families also tend to have fewer children’s books at home.

Educators are trying to enroll more Hispanic children in quality preschools. They’re also working with immigrant mothers.

The amount of time parents spent reading and telling stories to their children and interacting with them mattered more, (Michael) Lopez said, than the education level or income of the adults.

In Arizona, a Latino policy group wants to bar school districts from issuing certificates or diplomas when students complete eighth grade for fear it sends a message that their education is complete. In Mexico, it probably would be.

The hope is to take aim at the state’s high dropout rate and communicate to families, especially immigrant families, that completing eighth grade is really not that big of a deal.

In a visit to a San Jose middle school with a large immigrant enrollment, I noticed that the principal had banned limos and formal wear at the eighth-grade graduation. He said many students assume it’s the last graduation ceremony they’ll attend. It’s not that students don’t know they’re expected to go on to high school; they just don’t believe they’re likely to earn a diploma.

‘In the Know’

From the Onion News Network: Who should be drafted for combat in Iraq: Civil War re-enactors or Dungeons & Dragons players?

Sex, violence and reading

Henry Miller is off the approved list for student research projects at a Dallas high school after a 17-year-old girl complained about the explicit sex in Tropic of Cancer.

Many books approved for New York City classrooms include sex and violence, notes NYC Educator. If students are reading, does it matter what they’re reading?

A student who does service in our office regularly comes in with novels entitled Bitch, or Blood on the Sidewalk, and various others of this ilk. She says her aunt has a collection, and she seems to finish several a week. The list must be endless. Is it doing her any good? Who knows? But at least she’s reading. I have to admit I like that.

NYC’s readers say there are books they’d never assign but don’t mind if students decide to try on their own. (To my surprise, a number of teachers said they’re not allowed to assign and teach novels in class.)

I tried to read my parent’s copy of Tropic of Cancer when I was in junior high or high school. I thought Miller had managed to make sex boring. Of course, if Miller had written about a brooding hawk-visaged loner carrying off a young woman to his lonely castle . . . Well, I didn’t read those either, unless you count Jane Eyre, which is a great book for adolescent girls.

‘Our School’ and more

I’m guest blogging — that is, I wrote a post — on Charter Blog. Of course, my goal is spread the word about my charter-school book, Our School, now out in paperback.

Quirky Giving, which is fighting for charters in Maryland, runs excerpts from the book, including a few that I’d forgotten were in there, such as a mother’s speech at Downtown College Prep’s open house:

“I chose DCP because DCP gave me opportunity of better education for my son to go to university. He will be the first…[She breaks down in tears.] I vow to you he is going to university and to the best university. He didn’t show ganas [desire/grit] at the beginning. Now he has ganas and he is on the honor roll. It’s my responsibility and the responsibility of all parents to come in, to ask questions, to ask for help — that’s why they are here. They have knowledge to help our kids. We have to work together to help our kids get to university. Come to meetings, talk to teachers, shake their hands [She starts crying again.] I have no words to say how proud I am to be here.”

If memory serves, her son went on to San Diego State.

In another post, QG explains how Baltimore schools manipulate indirect costs to suggest that charter schools get too much money — even though charters get less than half of the $13,000 allocated per student.

Tomorrow, I’m doing a “table talk” at 1 pm at the California Charter Schools Conference in San Diego.

On April 4, I’ll be in Seattle for a talk and lunch at 11:30 am in the Commons, third floor of Parrington Hall, University of Washington. The Center for Reinventing Education will host the “Policymakers Exchange.” Don’t forget to RSVP by March 30 to bardacke@u.washington.edu or Maggie Bardacke at 206-685-2214. I’m told seats and lunches are going fast.

An evolving carnival

Darwin is the theme of this week’s Carnival of Homeschooling, which is hosted by Alasandra.