Pundit and PR man

Black commentator Armstrong Williams took $240,000 to promote No Child Left Behind on his syndicated TV show and to drum up support among black journalists. USA Today reports:

The campaign . . . required commentator Armstrong Williams “to regularly comment on NCLB during the course of his broadcasts,” and to interview Education Secretary Rod Paige for TV and radio spots that aired during the show in 2004.

Williams said Thursday he understands that critics could find the arrangement unethical, but “I wanted to do it because it’s something I believe in.”

If he believed in it, he’d do it for free. Taking money means Williams was a PR man pretending to be a journalist. When the story came out, Tribune Media Services dropped Williams as a syndicated columnist. (I tried to get on as a TMS columnist four years ago, but they said the market was too tight.)

The top Democrat on the House Education Committee, Rep. George Miller, a supporter of NCLB, thinks the contract is “probably illegal.” An investigation will sort that out. Certainly, the government spends a lot of money on “public information,” despite the ban on “propaganda.” But it’s supposed to done out in the open. Eduwonk, noting that NCLB’s defenders can’t defend the Williams’ deal, calls the Department of Education the gang that can’t flack straight.

Corporations are trying to buy buzz, writes Jeff Jarvis. The goal is to get consumers talking favorably about a product without using overt ads. Bloggers will have a chance to sell their credibility. It’s not worth it.

See more links on Instapundit.

Update: The General Accounting Office decided recently the government can’t distribute videos promoting its policies without identification, reports the New York Times.

The disclosure about the arrangement coincides with a decision by the Government Accountability Office that the administration had violated a law against unauthorized federal propaganda by distributing television news segments that promoted drug enforcement policies without identifying their origin. More than 300 news programs reaching more than 22 million households broadcast the segments. The accountability office made a similar ruling in May about news segments promoting Medicare policies, and the Drug Enforcement Agency stopped distributing the segments then.

The Clinton administration began the practice of sending unidentified videos to news programs, according to the Times.

“The Clinton administration was probably even more active than the Bush administration” in distributing news segments promoting its policies, said Laurence Moskowitz, chairman and chief executive of Medialink, a major producer of promotional news segments.

Why broadcast a government-provided video? It’s free and requires no staff time.

About Joanne


  1. Walter E. Wallis says:

    I eagerly await the little disclaimers at the bottom of MSM broadcasts.
    At that, though, this was a dumb move. But then you can not expect the democrats to have ALL the idiots, can you?

  2. Richard Brandshaft says:

    Good work, linking to a story unfavorable to “your side” –NCLB supporters. That shouldn’t be unusual enough to warrant congratulations, but one sees less and less of it these days.

  3. Mike in Texas says:

    This one it too easy, but kudos to you, Joanne, for sharing it even though it doesn’t look good for your side

  4. I think education is top priority for our children. The question where to get a good education is an interesting one. High School students age 17 – 18 when graduating enter a world with two maybe three choices. 1, College, 2, Tech School, or 3 working. Most 17-18 year olds are not ready for the society in the work force and lets face it how far do children get on a highschool education. Our Government, States, cities, School Districts would benefit from an extended education right from high school. another 2-4 years education continued right from high school would guide students in areas of need, interest, and what they then can be prepared for in society. A better understanding of the world and becoming part of it. Other countries extend high school education to year 14 and reap the benefits. Another point colleges and techhnical school should be paid by our taxes for those who participate in them. OUr children would be getting an education above statistics, our world would be better off, and those who use the education reap the benefit, but everyone has the chance to continue an education.

  5. Nuh? So stripper is OK but shochet isn’t?


  1. Substandard standards

    I spent some time reading The State of State Math Standards 2005 (PDF) and it’s pretty interesting. If you can’t find any good reality programming on television, but you still want some entertainment that is both humorous and disturbing, you might want…

  2. Armstrong Williams Sells His Soul

    As a classroom teacher that is interested in sytemic reform of public education, I have very mixed feelings toward the No Child Left Behind Act. In some areas…

  3. Number 2 Pencil operates on a shoestring budget, I swear!

    This is…odd: The Bush administration paid a prominent commentator to promote the No Child Left Behind schools law to fellow blacks and to give the education secretary media time, records show. A company run by Armstrong Williams, the syndicated comme…

  4. JennyD says:

    NCLB, Armstrong Williams, Journalism, and Schools

    It took me several days to get over my outrage at the Dept. of Education paying Armstrong Williams to promote No Child Left Behind. Now that I’ve settled down, I can say something. And I want to say something different than what I’ve been reading.