Facts left behind

William Raspberry makes several mistakes in a column on No Child Left Behind, writes Eduwonk.

He frets that the law holds schools accountable for student test scores on a single day (it doesn’t, states can measure school performance by averaging scores over multiple years), he buys a hypothetical argument about a school making great strides but still not making “adequate yearly progress” (less of a problem than it appears because of the law’s “safe harbor” provisions), and he accepts the notion that offering students in low-performing schools public school choice, tutoring, or worst of all requiring school districts and states to do something about those schools amounts to “punishment.”

I just promised a reader I’d include some links explaining NCLB. Here’s Education Week’s guide and the U.S. Education Department’s NCLB site, which is not very well designed, in my opinion.

About Joanne

Comments

  1. I concur that the website is not well-designed, and my latest post critiques the NCLB main page in detail. It’s rather amazing that there can be so many design flaws in such a small space.

  2. Mark Odell says:

    Here‘s another link to Douglas’ post, for those of us on whose browsers the URL redirection fails.